2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/istafrica.2017.8102412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An integrated framework for benchmarking e-government projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pemerintah menggunakan e-Governance untuk meningkatkan efisiensi, dan efektivitas sistem administrasi publik dan pemberian layanan. Sifat digital yang dinamik memberi kesempatan kepada negara-negara berkembang untuk sepenuhnya menerima e-Governance(eGov), yang pada akhirnya akan berkontribusi memenuhi kebutuhan dan melayani warganya [22].…”
Section: Gambar 1 : Smart City Initiativeunclassified
“…Pemerintah menggunakan e-Governance untuk meningkatkan efisiensi, dan efektivitas sistem administrasi publik dan pemberian layanan. Sifat digital yang dinamik memberi kesempatan kepada negara-negara berkembang untuk sepenuhnya menerima e-Governance(eGov), yang pada akhirnya akan berkontribusi memenuhi kebutuhan dan melayani warganya [22].…”
Section: Gambar 1 : Smart City Initiativeunclassified
“…In the last decade, there has been pressure and demand from citizens to provide government services online, due to growing technological maturity lowering the risk of adopting new technologies. There is also international pressure to participate in the eEconomy and be part of the global economic network (Hatsu and Ngassam, 2017). This pressure forced policy and decision makers, including those in poor and less developed countries, to facilitate the move to eGovernment systems.…”
Section: Egovernment: An Overview and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistance to change (Napitupulu et al, 2017;Otieno and Omwenga, 2015;Deakins et al, 2010;Ebrahim and Irani, 2005) Lack of suitable legal framework/ Dwivedi, 2009) Lack of financial resources (Napitupulu , et al, 2017;Deakins et al, 2010;Mberi et al, 2017;Ebrahim and Irani, 2005) Lack of clear vision and strategy (Kigwana et al, 2017;Hatsu and Ngassam 2016) Lack of ICT skills/ professional staff (Ahmed, 2013 ;Bhuiyan, 2010;Gagnon et al, 2010) Lack of coordination among organisations (Napitupulu , et al, 2017;Alkhilani, 2014;Gagnon et al, 2010) Complex or poor organisational structure (Verkijika and Wet, 2016;Al-Fakhri et al, 2008;Altameem et al, 2007) Insufficient support from the top management (Jadi and Jie, 2014;Bhuiyan, 2010;Lau et al, 2008;Altameem et al, 2007) Negative attitude towards technology (Elaswad and Jensen, 2016;Chalhoub, 2010) Lack of e-communications with all constituents for e-service delivery (Hatsu and Ngassam 2016;Fedorowicz et al, 2010;Zhang et al, 2005) Security of confidential data Privacy of personal data (Elaswad and Jensen, 2016;Alenezi et al, 2013;Fedorowicz et al, 2010;Al-Fakhri et al, 2008;Basu, 2004) Use of outdated technology (Alenezi et al, 2013;Gagnon et al, 2010) Poor technological infrastructure (Elaswad and Jensen, 2016;…”
Section: Barriers Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations