An integrated risk-based assessment of the North Sea to guide ecosystem-based management

Piet, G.J.; Culhane, Fiona; Jongbloed, R.H.; Robinson, Leonie A.; Rumes, B.; Tamis, J.E.

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.001

Cited by 34 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus-and based on [25,26]-the different risks involved can be categorized based on the taxonomy adopted in this work, which is organized according to the 2 hierarchical risk levels considered here, namely; the system risk (SR) and the system component risk (Scn) (Figures 1 and 2).…”

Section: Proposed Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Risk Assessment in Collaborative Networks to Promote Sustainable Systems in Innovation Ecosystems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays—and due to an increasingly competitive world—organizations need to collaborate in an open innovation context to be efficient and effective by achieving high levels of innovation with their products and services. However, the existing resources—as well as the innovation achieved from the diversity of partners involved—brings challenges to the management; in particularly with risk management. To fulfill such needs, risk management frameworks have been created to support managers, on preventing threats with systems development, although without properly account the influence of each system component, on the entire system, as well as the subjectivity within human perception. To account for these issues, a framework supported by fuzzy logic is presented in this work, to evaluate the risk level on system development in open innovation environment. The approach robustness is assessed by using a case study, where the challenges and benefits found are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Proposed Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework for Risk Assessment in Collaborative Networks to Promote Sustainable Systems in Innovation Ecosystems

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…from the totality of activities. Various approaches to Ecosystem-Based Management are developed (De Jonge et al, 2012;Piet et al, 2019). These integrated assessments can provide insight into scale-effects, cumulative effects, and the interactions between ecological, social, and economic risks.…”

Section: Risk Governance Should Be Flexible and Adaptive To New Incommentioning

confidence: 99%

Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial claims concerning the rapidly growing European offshore wind sector give rise to various ideas for the multi-use application of wind farms. Seaweed is considered a promising feedstock for food and feed that could be produced at offshore wind farms. Concerns about risks resulting in liability claims and insurance premiums are often seen as show-stoppers to multi-use at offshore wind farms. In this study, key environmental risks of seaweed cultivation at offshore wind farms, identified through literature review, are characterized based on stakeholder consultation. The current approach to risk governance is evaluated to assess how it can handle the uncertain, complex, and/or ambiguous risks of multi-use. It is concluded that current risk governance for multi-use is poorly equipped to deal with the systemic nature of risks. Risk governance should be a joint effort of governments and private regulators. It can improve if it is based on an adaptive framework for risk assessment that can deal with complex, systemic risks. Furthermore, it should be flexible and inclusive, i.e., open to new incoming information and stakeholder input, and taking into account and communicate about the different stakes and values of the various parties involved. The importance of communication and inclusion must be recognized, which promotes participation of concerned stakeholders.

show abstract

“…Gedetailleerde kwantitatieve modellen zijn nodig om de verhouding tussen de vangst (voedselvoorziening) en beschermingsdoelen te onderzoeken (Piet et al, 2019). Deze voorbeeld uitwerking van een mogelijke Noordzee bijdrage aan de PBL Natuurverkenning laat zien wat voor kennis er beschikbaar is wat betreft rekenmethoden/scenario analyses in relatie tot een aantal beleidsopgaven die in deze rapportage op voorhand aangemerkt zijn als meest relevant.…”

Section: Duurzame Voedselvoorzieningunclassified

NatuurVerkenning voor de Noordzee : voorbeeld uitwerking van een Noordzee bijdrage aan de Natuurverkenningen

Jongbloed¹,

I.²,

Tamis³

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wageningen Marine Research aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor gevolgschade, noch voor schade welke voortvloeit uit toepassingen van de resultaten van werkzaamheden of andere gegevens verkregen van Wageningen Marine Research opdrachtgever vrijwaart Wageningen Marine Research van aanspraken van derden in verband met deze toepassing. Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag weergegeven en/of gepubliceerd worden, gefotokopieerd of op enige andere manier gebruikt worden zonder schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever of auteur.

show abstract

An integrated risk-based assessment of the North Sea to guide ecosystem-based management

Cited by 34 publications

References 24 publications

A Framework for Risk Assessment in Collaborative Networks to Promote Sustainable Systems in Innovation Ecosystems

A Framework for Risk Assessment in Collaborative Networks to Promote Sustainable Systems in Innovation Ecosystems

Governing Risks of Multi-Use: Seaweed Aquaculture at Offshore Wind Farms

NatuurVerkenning voor de Noordzee : voorbeeld uitwerking van een Noordzee bijdrage aan de Natuurverkenningen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About