2011
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2010.2102770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Integro-Differential Model for 3-D Eddy Current Computation in Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation between the resistance variation and the electrical conductivity of the tested material depends on the eddy currents distribution in the latter, which can be obtained by numerical modeling [8]. Four parameters can be used to characterize the CFPR ply anisotropic conductivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between the resistance variation and the electrical conductivity of the tested material depends on the eddy currents distribution in the latter, which can be obtained by numerical modeling [8]. Four parameters can be used to characterize the CFPR ply anisotropic conductivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The whole system is characterized by the vacuum magnetic permeability (µ 0 ). To avoid the modeling at the filament scale, a homogenized nonlinear electrical conductivity tensor is defined for the sample, given by (1), where σ // and σ T denote the conductivities parallel and transverse to the filaments [2][3][4].…”
Section: The Modeled Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical modeling is then often necessary [1,2], where the conventional numerical tools have difficulties to provide accurate solutions in reasonable computing times due to multiscale dimensions, nonlinearities and high anisotropies. In these cases, specific modeling approaches meeting a better compromise between accuracy and computing time are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among various NDT methods [10][11][12][13][14], ECT is advantageous because of its easy operation, single-side detection, low requirement of surface preparation, and applicability in harsh environment, as well as other properties [15]. Hence ECT has taken an increasing interest in the detection and characterization of defects in CFRP recently [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%