1991
DOI: 10.1016/0898-1221(91)90139-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An inverse problem for the three dimensional vector helmholtz equation for a perfectly conducting obstacle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSM is a very rapid computational method when compared with other optimization approaches, as it requires very few priori data and involves only the solutions of linear ill-posed problems. Detecting unknown objects using LSM has found diverse applications in many areas, such as target identification, ground penetrating radars (GPR), medical diagnostics for cancer, and hypothermia [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSM is a very rapid computational method when compared with other optimization approaches, as it requires very few priori data and involves only the solutions of linear ill-posed problems. Detecting unknown objects using LSM has found diverse applications in many areas, such as target identification, ground penetrating radars (GPR), medical diagnostics for cancer, and hypothermia [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we introduce a numerical method to solve this inverse problem based on the Herglotz wave function method introduced by Colton and Monk in [11 and further developed by Misici, Zirilli, and their coauthors in [12]- [15]. In particular, based on previous work by Misici and Zirilli 14], we extend the Herglotz function method introduced in 11 for acoustically soft obstacles to hard obstacles or obstacles characterized by an acoustic impedance.…”
Section: Onmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, we note that the convergence to the true obstacle failed when the single-frequency scheme was used with a higher frequency (k = 2.0). It is also noteworthy that when, instead of using the amplitude-based misfit functional, we used J 1 [defined in (14)], convergence to the true scatterer failed for the same initial guess and overall configuration; convergence was possible only when the initial guess came very close to the target. Thus far, these results lend support to the claim that the combination of the amplitude-based misfit functional with the frequencycontinuation scheme alleviate the difficulties associated with the solution multiplicity.…”
Section: Example I: Circular Scatterermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may roughly classify the approaches that have been followed, into methods that rely on optimization-based schemes (e.g. [1][2][3][4][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]), and methods that do not explicitly seek to minimize a misfit functional (e.g. [19][20][21][22][23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%