2004
DOI: 10.20506/rst.23.3.1519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation into the source and spread of foot and mouth disease virus from a wildlife conservancy in Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation seems to be different within the impala population in the Kruger National Park in South Africa, where clinical FMD has been reported, and subclinical infections have been shown to occur much more regularly than previously suspected [19]. It is hypothesized that during the acute state of the disease some species may act as intermediaries in the transmission of FMD, mainly between buffalos and cattle [6,18,19]. The current findings concur with reports of very low seroprevalence of antibodies against FMDV in non-buffalo wildlife species (4.4%) compared to buffalos (67.7%) in Eastern Africa [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The situation seems to be different within the impala population in the Kruger National Park in South Africa, where clinical FMD has been reported, and subclinical infections have been shown to occur much more regularly than previously suspected [19]. It is hypothesized that during the acute state of the disease some species may act as intermediaries in the transmission of FMD, mainly between buffalos and cattle [6,18,19]. The current findings concur with reports of very low seroprevalence of antibodies against FMDV in non-buffalo wildlife species (4.4%) compared to buffalos (67.7%) in Eastern Africa [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They act as long term maintenance hosts for the SAT serotypes (SAT 1, SAT 2 and SAT 3) of FMDV with no obvious clinical disease [4,16]. Other cloven-hoofed wildlife species may develop antibodies against FMD infections; however, their roles in excretion, transmission and persistence of FMDV either have not been conclusively studied or have been shown to be less important than the role of the buffalos [7,17,18]. In South Africa, the impala ( Aepyceros melampus ) has been shown to play a potentially significant role in the propagation of FMD outbreaks between livestock and wildlife [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou), is very low, suggesting that they are spill-over hosts rather than maintenance populations (Anderson et al, 1993) (Figure 2.2D). Impala have also been implicated as intermediate hosts between buffalo and cattle (Bastos et al, 2000;Hargreaves et al, 2004;Vosloo et al, 2006). Impala have also been implicated as intermediate hosts between buffalo and cattle (Bastos et al, 2000;Hargreaves et al, 2004;Vosloo et al, 2006).…”
Section: Maintenance Of Fmd In Different Reservoir Populations In Submentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clear experimental evidence for FMDV transmission from artificially infected buffalo to livestock has been elusive. Although there are few experimental reports of buffalo-to-cattle transmission, epidemiological field data and phylogenetic evidence in southern Africa demonstrates that transmission from buffalo to FMD-free cattle does occur (Bastos et al, 2000;Hargreaves et al, 2004;Thomson et al, 2003;Vosloo et al, 2009). A further four studies reported absence of infection in cattle despite protracted contact with persistently infected buffalo Gainaru et al, 1986;Condy & Hedger, 1974;Anderson et al, 1979).…”
Section: Opportunities For Buffalo-to-livestock Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While southern African countries have focused on the risk posed by buffalo, the contribution of buffalo to FMD outbreaks in livestock in other parts of Africa remains unclear and the role of other wild ungulate species is still debated (Hargreaves et al 2004; Kock et al, in press). It is hoped that activities identified within the PCP-FMD will allow more complete evaluation of the risks associated with wildlife, providing opportunities for risk-based approaches that are more environmentally nuanced and allow for the development of disease control pathways that address widespread concerns about the impact of FMD control on wildlife conservation (FAO-OIE 2012; Kock et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussion: Key Actions For An Integrated Approach To Fmd Comentioning
confidence: 99%