1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf02325114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of propagating cracks by dynamic photoelasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A split Nopkinson bar system [ 7 ] with test specimens of 9.5x9.5x254 nins or 9.5x9.5x38l rims were used . …”
Section: Dtt Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A split Nopkinson bar system [ 7 ] with test specimens of 9.5x9.5x254 nins or 9.5x9.5x38l rims were used . …”
Section: Dtt Test Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irwin [2] used the equations of the stress field near the crack tip for Mode I to calculate the stress intensity factor from a single fringe data. Bradley and Kobayashi [3] modified the method of Irwin by using the values of the fringe order from two consecutive fringes. Schroedel and Smith [4] proposed the calculation of the stress intensity factor using the values of the fringe order on a line normal to the crack tip, method which was subsequently developed by Smith [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schroedel and Smith [4] proposed the calculation of the stress intensity factor using the values of the fringe order on a line normal to the crack tip, method which was subsequently developed by Smith [5]. A methodology similar to that proposed in [3] was developed by Etheridge and Dally [6], which introduced a correction factor for the boundary effects in the expressions of the stress intensity factor. Chona et al [7] used the Westergaard stress field expressions, written as series expansion and obtained the coefficients of the expansion using photoelastic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…instantaneous dynamic stress intensity factor, during crack propagation the dynamic stress intensity fact(.-, which is extracted from transient dynamic isochromatics surrounding the propagating crack tip, is used to measure the dynamic fracture toughness. A commonly used data reduction procedure for this purpose is to fit a theoretical, near-field, static isochromatics to the recorded experimental dynamic isochromatics and to then equate the resultant static stress intensity factor of the former to the unknown dynamic stress intensity factor of the latter [2][3][4][5]. Error estimates for using a static near-field stress to extract the dynamic stress intensity factor have been made by several investigators [6][7][8] and in particular, exhaustively by Rossmanith and Irwin [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%