2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An investigation of the spatial determinants of the local prevalence of poverty in rural Malawi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
10
65
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of asset wealth in positively enhancing the well-being of rural households has been reported by other studies in the region (Benson, Chamberlin, and Rhinehart 2005;Bokosi 2006;Ellis and Ade Freeman 2004;Mukherjee and Benson 2003;Mussa and Pauw 2011). Generally, education and asset accumulation are crucially important in determining the well-being of the households in the rural communities of the study countries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of asset wealth in positively enhancing the well-being of rural households has been reported by other studies in the region (Benson, Chamberlin, and Rhinehart 2005;Bokosi 2006;Ellis and Ade Freeman 2004;Mukherjee and Benson 2003;Mussa and Pauw 2011). Generally, education and asset accumulation are crucially important in determining the well-being of the households in the rural communities of the study countries.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Earlier studies have also reported similar results that better-off households are characterized by asset accumulation involving livestock and off-farm income sources (Benson, Chamberlin, and Rhinehart 2005;Ellis and Ade Freeman 2004;Mussa and Pauw 2011). On the other hand, the number of farm plots was found to be negatively related to the well-being of the households (Table 7).…”
Section: Malawisupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Simelton et al [14] observed that small droughts might have relatively large effects on maize yields in the face of inadequate adaptive capacity and vice versa because high adaptive capacity lowers vulnerability. A variety of socio-economic proxies have been suggested for use in indicator-based approaches for vulnerability assessment, including: level of education and poverty, availability of safety nets and transportation systems [68][69][70][71][72][73][74].…”
Section: Adaptive Capacity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly true in analyses related to healthcare (e.g., incidence of diseases and access to medical services e.g., [40][41][42][43]), environmental protection (e.g., [44][45][46]), the real estate market (e.g., [47,48]), poverty (e.g., [49,50]) and migration (e.g., [51][52][53][54]). The GWR tool is also used in labour market analyses (e.g., [55][56][57][58]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%