2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ising Model Inspired Extension of the Product-Based MP Framework for SAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first two, WalkSAT [33] and Dimetheus [12,13], are SAT solvers, and are applied directly to the SAT problems in question (after naive clause-wise conversion to CNF). The third, Selby's solver [32], is a specialized implementation of the Hamze-de Freitas-Selby algorithm, written to solve Ising problems on D-Wave's native Chimera architecture.…”
Section: Software Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two, WalkSAT [33] and Dimetheus [12,13], are SAT solvers, and are applied directly to the SAT problems in question (after naive clause-wise conversion to CNF). The third, Selby's solver [32], is a specialized implementation of the Hamze-de Freitas-Selby algorithm, written to solve Ising problems on D-Wave's native Chimera architecture.…”
Section: Software Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results on random benchmarks were exciting this year as the (single core) solver dimetheus (Gableske 2014a) by Oliver Gableske outperformed all other solvers, even parallel ones (which ran on twelve cores), on random benchmarks with a huge margin. dimetheus consists of two engines, one based on Message Passing (MP) (Gableske 2014b) and one based on Stochastic Local Search (SLS) (Balint and Schöning 2012). The MP engine is used to initialize the SLS engine with an "almost satisfying" assignment.…”
Section: What's Hot In Satmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For incomplete algorithms, Stochastic Local Search (SLS) solvers [CLS14, LCWS14, CLS15, LCW + 14, LHC20] and Survey Propagation (SP) solvers are very popular. SLS solvers show strong complementarity with CDCL solvers on solving a number of important application SAT instances, e.g., those instances encoded from station repacking [CZ21,FNLB16]; SP solvers show great effectiveness on solving very hugesized random 3-SAT instances (e.g., with one million variables at the clause-to-variable ratio of 4.2) [MPZ02, BMZ05,KSS12,Gab13a,Gab14,Gab13b]. This paper focuses on modern CDCL SAT solvers which are very efficient for real applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%