2018
DOI: 10.3791/57142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Objective and Reproducible Test of Olfactory Learning and Discrimination in Mice

Abstract: Olfaction is the predominant sensory modality in mice and influences many important behaviors, including foraging, predator detection, mating, and parenting. Importantly, mice can be trained to associate novel odors with specific behavioral responses to provide insight into olfactory circuit function. This protocol details the procedure for training mice on a Go/No-Go operant learning task. In this approach, mice are trained on hundreds of automated trials daily for 2–4 weeks and can then be tested on novel Go… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To block olfactory sensory input, we performed unilateral naris occlusion, with the occluded side serving as the sensory-deprived sample and the open side as the control ( Najbauer and Leon, 1995 ; Quast et al, 2017 ; Yamaguchi and Mori, 2005 ). Mice were trained to discriminate various odorants using an olfactory-cued learning paradigm ( Liu et al, 2017 ; Liu et al, 2018 ). This form of olfactory training exposed mice to several different odorants while also actively engaging the olfactory system to facilitate olfactory-discrimination learning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To block olfactory sensory input, we performed unilateral naris occlusion, with the occluded side serving as the sensory-deprived sample and the open side as the control ( Najbauer and Leon, 1995 ; Quast et al, 2017 ; Yamaguchi and Mori, 2005 ). Mice were trained to discriminate various odorants using an olfactory-cued learning paradigm ( Liu et al, 2017 ; Liu et al, 2018 ). This form of olfactory training exposed mice to several different odorants while also actively engaging the olfactory system to facilitate olfactory-discrimination learning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite side of the tube was cut beveled for insertion into the nasal cavity. For increased olfactory activity, we implemented a previously described olfactory cued learning paradigm ( Liu et al, 2017 ; Liu et al, 2018 ) where water deprived animals were trained to discriminate a water reward associated odor (S+) from a no reward associated (S−) odor. In brief, animals were trained to poke their nose into an odor delivery port to receive a water reward.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mice were trained 5 days per week in the two-choice operant paradigm wherein one olfactory stimulus was paired with the reinforcer (Figure 3A). Odorants were used at response sites to aid in stimulus discrimination (65) and mask any odor which may be present in reinforcers, which could otherwise bias response learning (66). Reward-paired scent was randomly assigned and counterbalanced across subjects, and target location was randomized between trials to preclude locationbased learning.…”
Section: Behavioral Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary aliphatic alcohols are commonly used to survey neural activity in a variety of olfactory regions, probe the behavioral limits of odor discrimination, and assess odor-structure activity relationships in mice (e.g., Sato et al 1994 ; Malnic et al 1999 ; Inaki et al 2002 ; Laska et al 2008 ; Johnson et al 2009 ; Xu and Wilson 2012 ; Iurilli and Datta 2017 ; Liu et al 2018 ). The stimulus concentrations used in these studies vary widely as no systematic survey of the relative sensitivity to these odorants exists in this species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%