2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An objective comparison of pre-processing methods for enhancement of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of this, the resulting total ion chromatograms do not exhibit a clear separation of the sample mixture. Even though great improvements have been made in the instrumentation, the output signals still contain a large portion of noise embedding the useful information together with false peaks and spikes [102]. Due to the above mentioned problems, the data interpretation can be much more time-consuming than the data acquisition and has become a bottleneck in LC-MS method development and analysis.…”
Section: Component Detection Algorithm (Coda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of this, the resulting total ion chromatograms do not exhibit a clear separation of the sample mixture. Even though great improvements have been made in the instrumentation, the output signals still contain a large portion of noise embedding the useful information together with false peaks and spikes [102]. Due to the above mentioned problems, the data interpretation can be much more time-consuming than the data acquisition and has become a bottleneck in LC-MS method development and analysis.…”
Section: Component Detection Algorithm (Coda)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources and handling of random background noise, either of electrical [26][27][28] or chemical nature [29], noise reduction through special software application [30], interferences introduced through degradation or metabolism of analytes/drugs during analysis [31,32], co-or post-translational protein modifications [33,34], background ion scrubbing via specific reactions with dimethylsulfide [35,36], or any analyte-specific interferences are also beyond the scope of this work. We would like to refer interested readers in the above-mentioned topics to the respective cited literature and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is often no significant improvements in S/N with the application of the above mentioned peak enhancement methods when non‐white noise is present, which is exactly the case in reality. As explained in the literature,35 since non‐white noise is not randomly distributed, some frequencies of noise can be enhanced so that the gain in S/N can be decreased. Furthermore, insufficient data points of a UPLC/TOFMS peak also contribute to the poor performance of the above algorithms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%