2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5fd7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Observationally Constrained Analytical Model for Predicting the Magnetic Field Vectors of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections at 1 au

Abstract: We report on an observationally constrained analytical model, the INterplanetary Flux ROpe Simulator (INFROS), for predicting the magnetic-field vectors of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) in the interplanetary medium. The main architecture of INFROS involves using the near-Sun flux rope properties obtained from the observational parameters that are evolved through the model in order to estimate the magnetic field vectors of interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs) at any heliocentric distance. We have formulated a new approa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of the interactions between the CME flux rope with the ambient solar wind and other CMEs depends strongly on the intrinsic magnetic structure of flux rope (e.g., Lugaz et al, 2013). The intrinsic flux rope properties can give early warning of the potential space weather consequences, but most importantly it provides critical information for constraining flux ropes in a variety of semiempirical and first-principle models describing the propagation and evolution of CMEs in the corona and heliosphere, such as ForeCAT and FIDO (Kay et al, 2013(Kay et al, , 2017, 3DCORE (Möstl et al, 2018), INFROS (Sarkar et al, 2020), Enlil (Odstrcil et al, 2004), EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA; Pomoell and Poedts, 2018), and SUSANOO-CME (Shiota and Kataoka, 2016). Although first-principle models are so-far routinely run with only cone-model CMEs for space weather forecasting purposes, for example EUHFORIA is now actively tested with magnetized CMEs to give improved predictions and more realistic information on the effect of CME interactions (Scolini et al, 2019(Scolini et al, , 2020Verbeke et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the interactions between the CME flux rope with the ambient solar wind and other CMEs depends strongly on the intrinsic magnetic structure of flux rope (e.g., Lugaz et al, 2013). The intrinsic flux rope properties can give early warning of the potential space weather consequences, but most importantly it provides critical information for constraining flux ropes in a variety of semiempirical and first-principle models describing the propagation and evolution of CMEs in the corona and heliosphere, such as ForeCAT and FIDO (Kay et al, 2013(Kay et al, , 2017, 3DCORE (Möstl et al, 2018), INFROS (Sarkar et al, 2020), Enlil (Odstrcil et al, 2004), EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA; Pomoell and Poedts, 2018), and SUSANOO-CME (Shiota and Kataoka, 2016). Although first-principle models are so-far routinely run with only cone-model CMEs for space weather forecasting purposes, for example EUHFORIA is now actively tested with magnetized CMEs to give improved predictions and more realistic information on the effect of CME interactions (Scolini et al, 2019(Scolini et al, , 2020Verbeke et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus not possible to extract information for the magnetic flux of the CME using cotemporal magnetogram-based approaches (e.g. see Dissauer et al 2018a,b;Pal et al 2018;Dissauer et al 2019;Sarkar et al 2020). In this case, a base value of 80.0 × 10 12 Wb was used for the EUHFORIA runs, which represents the toroidal flux and is related to the magnetic field strength via equation 7 given in Verbeke et al (2019b).…”
Section: Magnetic Flux and Helicity Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seed electrons pose themselves a threat to satel-lites through surface charging (e.g. Garrett and Whittlesey, 2011;Sarno-Smith et al, 2016).…”
Section: Predictability Of Interplanetary Shocks and Energetic Particle Flux Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%