2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87696-0_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Ontology-Centric Approach to Sensor-Mission Assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core sensor, platform and task ontologies are based on pre-existing models, chosen for their relatively stable and accepted nature 6 . The ontologies are open to new asset, task, and capability types -in fact, the NIIRS framework was added as an extension to the original ontologies.…”
Section: Figure 1: Missions and Means Framework Isr Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core sensor, platform and task ontologies are based on pre-existing models, chosen for their relatively stable and accepted nature 6 . The ontologies are open to new asset, task, and capability types -in fact, the NIIRS framework was added as an extension to the original ontologies.…”
Section: Figure 1: Missions and Means Framework Isr Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of a solution to this problem, several works have proposed the use of some form of knowledge base or mapping that relates sensor capabilities to task requirements, to aid either automatic or semi-automatic identification of suitable assets for tasks 3,4,5 . In our previous work 6 we developed an approach to automatic assettask assignment founded on the Military Missions and Means Framework (MMF) 7 . We created ontologies of task and asset types, and an automatic procedure for matching one to the other, through the capabilities required on one and provided by the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our original knowledge base and task-asset matching procedure 6,7 was based on an ontology derived from the Military Missions and Means Framework (MMF). 8 To derive our ontology, we formalized concepts and relationships from the MMF documentation, the main ones being as shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Knowledge-based Matching Of Isr Assets To Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, 6,7 we developed an approach founded on the Military Missions and Means Framework (MMF). 8 We created ontologies of task and asset types, and an automatic procedure for matching one to the other, through the capabilities required on one and provided by the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can further argue that they can just be considered as a black box, especially that those components are not directly accessible by applications. However, we chose to allow users to describe the internal components of devices (also done in [9,10]) by their name and type only.…”
Section: Device Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%