2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000jd900789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of microphysical properties of Arctic clouds observed in May and July 1998 during FIRE ACE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
284
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
16
284
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CPI records images of cloud particles with high resolution (2.3 µm) on a 1 million pixel charge coupled device. A 25 ns pulsed high-power laser is triggered when a cloud particle is detected in the sample volume by two lower powered particle detection lasers shining on photodiode detectors (Lawson et al, 2001). Due to the CPI's resolution, only particles larger than about 10 µm are counted.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPI records images of cloud particles with high resolution (2.3 µm) on a 1 million pixel charge coupled device. A 25 ns pulsed high-power laser is triggered when a cloud particle is detected in the sample volume by two lower powered particle detection lasers shining on photodiode detectors (Lawson et al, 2001). Due to the CPI's resolution, only particles larger than about 10 µm are counted.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on Arctic clouds have already been published describing microphysical and optical properties during projects such as FIRE-ACE (Shupe et al, 2001), SHEBA , and M-PACE (Shupe et al, 2008) and SEARCH (de Boer et al, 2009). For example, extensive in situ observations have been performed in mixed-phase clouds (Hobbs and Rangno, 1998;Lawson et al, 2001;Korolev et al, 2003;McFarquhar and Cober, 2004;McFarquhar et al, 2007) as well as remote sensing observations by Shupe et al (2001), Intrieri et al (2002), Dong and Mace (2003) and Zuidema et al (2005). There have also been a number of modeling studies published in the last year through analysis of a couple of case studies of single-and multi-layer mixed-phase clouds during M-PACE (Morrison et al, 2008;Fridlind et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focusses on observations obtained from a combination of instruments installed onboard the Polar-2 aircraft operated by the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI). These instruments include: a Polar Nephelometer (Gayet et al, 1997), a Cloud Particle Imager (CPI, Lawson et al, 2001) as well as standard Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP-100) to measure cloud particle properties in terms of scattering, morphology and size, and in-cloud partitioning of ice/water content. Remote sensing measurements were obtained onboard the Polar-2 aircraft from the Airborne Mobile Aerosol Lidar (AMALi, Stachlewska et al, 2004) and the Spectral Modular Airborne Radiation measurement sysTem (SMART, Wendisch et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the modeling approach to retrieve ice particle parameters used by Shcherbakov et al (2006a,b) assumed crystals to be hexagonal columns/plates. The airborne polar nephelometer (PN) by Gayet et al (2001) measures the scattering function of the ice particles and was used in conjunction with results from an imaging probe (CPI) (Lawson et al, 2001) to investigate the impact of the ice crystal habits on the radiative properties of cirrus clouds. This could be done only in a statistical approach with assumptions made regarding the particle shape within an ensemble of randomly oriented particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%