2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-08793-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An overview of research on natural resources and indigenous communities: a bibliometric analysis based on Scopus database (1979–2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the number of articles or frequency of keywords displayed in a varied circle size determines the unit size according to its weight. Then, the circle's position and color of different items in network mapping are used to classify the sample unit into a similar cluster (Anand and Gupta 2020;Mishra et al 2021;Rosato et al 2021). The calculation method used in this analysis is a fractional calculation method and for data normalization by the Linlog/Modularity method (Eck and Waltman 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the number of articles or frequency of keywords displayed in a varied circle size determines the unit size according to its weight. Then, the circle's position and color of different items in network mapping are used to classify the sample unit into a similar cluster (Anand and Gupta 2020;Mishra et al 2021;Rosato et al 2021). The calculation method used in this analysis is a fractional calculation method and for data normalization by the Linlog/Modularity method (Eck and Waltman 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the methodological criteria suggested by del Rı ´o-Rama et al (2020) for selecting the source, it was decided to conduct the study using the Scopus database, chosen primarily for its high-quality standards, wider coverage, ease in retrieving the data (Harzing and Alakangas, 2016) and excellent coverage of tourism journals. The Scopus database was selected because, when compared to other databases, such as PubMed and Web of Science, it has a more extensive abstract and citation database in terms of journal coverage (Mishra et al, 2021). In addition, the requirements for journal inclusion are stringent, comparable to Thompson ISI (Moya-Aneg on et al, 2007), but larger coverage than Web of Science (Park et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is common practice in reviews to report the performance of various research components, performance analysis may be found in most reviews, including those that do not participate in the scientific mapping (Donthu et al, 2021). The number of publications and citations, as well as the h-index, are the most often used indicators for analysis (Mishra et al, 2021). The second category is bibliometric mapping/graphic mapping of science, which is meant to depict the dynamic and structural characteristics of scientific works and progress (Koseoglu, 2016;Laengle et al, 2017;Merig o et al, 2018).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed study, we used bibliometric data retrieved from the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The authors chose the Scopus database as it contains a wide range of peerreviewed journals, provides a recognised index and other bibliographic indices (Mishra et al, 2021;Shen & Ho, 2020). Google Scholar as an online engine was used as it contains a wide range of citation sources (Roemer & Borchardt, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%