2016
DOI: 10.1108/s0731-905320150000035001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Overview of the Factor-augmented Error-Correction Model

Abstract: The Factor-augmented Error Correction Model (FECM) generalizes the factoraugmented VAR (FAVAR) and the Error Correction Model (ECM), combining errorcorrection, cointegration and dynamic factor models. It uses a larger set of variables compared to the ECM and incorporates the long-run information lacking from the FAVAR because of the latter's specification in differences. In this paper we review the specification and estimation of the FECM, and illustrate its use for forecasting and structural analysis by means… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The factor-augmented error correction model (FECM) introduced by Banerjee and Marcellino (2009) combines equilibrium-correction, cointegration and dynamic factor models, see Banerjee, Marcellino, and Masten (2016) for a discussion. In the FECM approach cointegration is captured between the variables and the factors.…”
Section: Other Approaches For Modelling Non-stationary Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor-augmented error correction model (FECM) introduced by Banerjee and Marcellino (2009) combines equilibrium-correction, cointegration and dynamic factor models, see Banerjee, Marcellino, and Masten (2016) for a discussion. In the FECM approach cointegration is captured between the variables and the factors.…”
Section: Other Approaches For Modelling Non-stationary Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general survey of the more popular methods for stationary variables is provided by Stock and Watson (2011). Methods suitable for the empirically important case of non-stationary data, still scarce, are reviewed in Barigozzi, Lippi and Luciani (2016) and Banerjee, Marcellino and Masten (2016). Examples of applications for forecasting and the construction of cyclical indicators are respectively given by, e.g., Giannone, Reichlin and Small (2008) and Altissimo, Cristadoro, Forni, Lippi and Veronese (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A noteworthy exception is that the time series that are considered I(1) in the FRED-MD classification are now kept in levels, whereas those that are considered as I(2) are differenced once. The methods included in the comparison are: (i) the factor error correction model (FECM) by Banerjee et al (2014bBanerjee et al ( , 2016Banerjee et al ( , 2017, (ii) the non-stationary dynamic factor model (N-DFM) by Barigozzi et al (2017, (iii) the maximumlikelihood procedure (ML) by Johansen (1995a), (iv) the QR-decomposed VECM (QR-VECM) by Liang and Schienle (2019), (v) the penalized maximum-likelihood (PML) by Wilms and Croux (2016), (vi) the single-equation penalized error correction selector (SPECS) and (vii) a factor-augmented SPECS (FASPECS). The latter method is simply the single-equation model derived from the FECM, based on the same principles as the FAPADL from the previous section.…”
Section: Forecast Comparisons For Cointegration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent proposals are brought forward in the literature that allow for application of these techniques on non-stationary and possibly cointegrated datasets. We sequentially discuss the dynamic factor model proposed by Barigozzi et al (2017 and the factor-augmented error correction model by Banerjee et al (2014bBanerjee et al ( , 2016.…”
Section: Modelling Cointegration Through Factor Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation