Análisis bibliométrico de la autoría femenina en artículos originales en la revista ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA

Giner-Soriano, Maria; López-Pereiro, Olaya; Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo, Edurne; Pons‐Vigués, Mariona; Morros, Rosa; Gómez-Lumbreras, Ainhoa

doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.002

Cited by 15 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…After screening for titles and abstracts, we assessed 115 full texts for eligibility. Fifty-four articles [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ] were then excluded because of different reasons such as a mismatch with inclusion criteria and unavailability of the full text (see Figure 1 and ...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review

Fichera

Busch

Rimondini

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Considering that radiology is still a male-dominated specialty in which men make up more than two thirds of the workforce, this systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current role of women in radiological imaging, focusing on the main aspects such as career progression, leadership, academic practice, and perceived discrimination. Three electronic databases were searched up to 21 October 2020. To identify additional records, weekly automatic email alerts were set up on PubMed until December 2020 and reference lists of key studies and included papers were screened. Two reviewers independently performed the search, study selection, quality appraisal, data extraction, and formal narrative synthesis. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer was involved. Across the 61 included articles, women worked more often part-time and held fewer positions of power in hospitals, on editorial boards, and at the academic level (associate and full professors). Women were less often in relevant positions in scientific articles, had fewer publications, and had a lower H-index. Discrimination and sexual harassment were experienced by up to 40% and 47% of female radiologists, respectively. Our study highlights that women in radiology are still underrepresented and play a marginal role in the field, struggling to reach top and leading positions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review

Fichera

Busch

Rimondini

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies by Alonso-Arroyo et al (2010), Borrell et al (2015), the Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica de Chile (CONICYT, 2017), González & Osca-Lluch (2018), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología, Conocimiento e Innovación (2020), have already highlighted it. The evidence continues to point at female under-representation in the context of article citation reports (Giner-Soriano et al, 2020). However, it is noteworthy that, in the three journals considered for this study, they present numbers that highlight the greater female participation.…”

Section: Authors Contributionmentioning

confidence: 59%

Bibliometric analysis in English language teaching and learning

Bakelak¹,

Rodríguez²

2022

Podium

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is the bibliometric analysis of the journals indexed in SciELO in the area of teaching and learning English as a second language. The journals searched were: How, Profile, and Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal. The search for information made it possible to compare different bibliometric indicators. Although it is true that the results of this research show that scientific production in the field is abundant, varied in terms of thematic lines, and collaborative, it is only reported in three journals indexed in SciELO; however, other research that reports on the scientific production on the teaching of English as a second language, all the scientific production published in journals indexed in SciELO is made invisible. Since most of the publications in the journals studied are by Latin American authors, it is evident that in other productions the region's research in the field is being ignored.

show abstract

“…El abanico de profesionales podría relacionarse una mayor proporción de primeras autoras femeninas en todo el periodo de estudio, con excepción del segundo trienio. En otras revistas pediátricas de corriente principal se ha visto una menor representación femenina, con tendencia a mayor participación de la mujer como primera autora a lo largo del tiempo [18][19][20] , lo que ha sido interpretado como una infra-representación femenina, especialmente si se considera que en la especialidad de pediatría hay una mayor participación de las mujeres 21 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Revista Chilena de Pediatría/Andes Pediatrica en el nuevo milenio. Análisis bibliométrico.

Oppenheimer

Río

et al. 2021

Andes pediatr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Andes Pediatrica/Revista Chilena de Pediatría (AP/RCHP), mantiene un perfil de documentos que abarca todos los formatos de la publicación científica, desde Artículos Originales (AO) hasta Cartas al Editor. Para una adecuada planificación editorial se requiere un análisis bibliométrico de largo plazo. Objetivo: Describir el perfil de AO publicados en AP/RCHP en las últimas 2 décadas. Metodología: Desde una lista de vocabulario controlado se estandarizaron los descriptores temáticos y metodológicos de los documentos del 2000 al 2020. Se analizó nacionalidad, género y profesión de los autores, tipología documental y diseño de los AO. Se analizó los descriptores citados en Google Schoolar y los más visitados en el sitio web de la revista en los últimos años. Resultados: Se publicaron 1.738 manuscritos, 580 (33,4%) AO, con un incremento de 59 a 129 AO entre el primer y último trienio. El promedio de autores fue superior para los AO (4,7) que para los no originales (3,0); el año 2020 hubo 9 colaboraciones multicéntricas de distintos países. Los AO de autores extranjeros incrementaron de 3,3 a 28,7%, la autoría en primera posición de profesionales no médicos aumentó de 15 a 31%, hubo predominio de primer autor femenino (relación 1,4/1). De los AO 9,1% eran experimentales, 3,3% cualitativos y el resto cuantitativos observacionales. Los descriptores más publicados fueron Nutrición, Infectología, Neonatología y Broncopulmonar, mientras que los más citados fueron Nutrición, Neonatología y Salud Oral, sin tendencia entre los más visitados. El 44% de los artículos más citados y el 35% de los más visitados fueron AO. Conclusiones: Destaca un importante incremento de AO publicados, con baja frecuencia de diseños experimentales. Hubo participación de autores de distintas nacionalidades y profesiones. Los AO contribuyeron a un tercio de las visitas y casi la mitad de las citas, sin demostrarse correlación entre los descriptores más publicados y los más citados.

show abstract

Análisis bibliométrico de la autoría femenina en artículos originales en la revista ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA

Cited by 15 publications

References 21 publications

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review

Is Empowerment of Female Radiologists Still Needed? Findings of a Systematic Review

Bibliometric analysis in English language teaching and learning

Revista Chilena de Pediatría/Andes Pediatrica en el nuevo milenio. Análisis bibliométrico.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About