Analisis Sistem Pengadaan Proyek Konstruksi Terhadap Penyerapan Anggaran Pemerintah Kabupaten Badung

Abstract

: The rate of absorption of a government budget, especially on the construction projects, determine whether or not the optimal development of a region. The faster the budget absorption of the construction projects, the faster the perceived benefits. The purpose of the study was to determine the rate of the budget absorption, to find out the factors in the construction project procurement systems that affect the slow budget absorption of the Local Government of the Badung Regency as well as the efforts to minimize such delays. The data were obtained from the parties involved in the procurement of the construction projects through questionnaires as the research instruments. In addition, the data were also obtained through interviews, observations and documentations. The variables used in the study were 38 variables and 60 persons as the respondents. The data analysis was conducted through descriptive analysis, absorption analysis and factor analysis. The scoring system used a Likert scale, and data processing was conducted by SPSS. The findings of the study show that the rate of absorption of the Badung Regency Government’s construction projects for Fiscal Year 2012 - 2013 was not in accordance with the plan, but the increase was more than that of the previous fiscal year. While the results of the factor analysis by using SPSS indicate that the factors that affecting the slow absorption budget in the procurement system of most construction projects are: the fear and caution of the parties in carrying out procurement activities, the change in the activity package, the slow preparation of the Owner's Estimate (OE), the incomplete procurement documents, the misrepresentation of the procurement regulations and the slow process of procurements. And the most effective effort to enhance the budget absorption are the determination of the communication standards, the coordination and the synchronization in the procurement of construction projects with all parties involved in the procurement systems.

Analysis of the Influence of Internal Factors on Project Performance in Low-Rise Commercial Building Construction Projects in Tangerang

“…If not properly anticipated, these mistakes will already be implemented, so the contractor bears the risk. This research is in line with research by Sutarja et al, (2020) the cause of delay is caused by owner, planning consultant, supervisory consultant, contractor, and results from the research by Rachid et al (2019) who found the causes of delays, payment problems made and ineffective planning and scheduling of contractors, while the results of this study are compared with previous studies thus the value of the coefficient of other factors on time performance is -0.134 (meaning the effect is negative), P Value on Y is 0.181 < 0.05 (meaning not significant), t-count on Y is 0.913 > T table 1.64 (meaning not significant) then it has no effect on time performance.…”

“…So that the work schedule becomes late in time, and costs result in an increase in project costs. And in line with research Sutarja et al (2020) found the cause of delay is caused by owner, planning consultant, supervisory consultant, contractor, non-technical problems of the surrounding community and government and other factors, while research by Buya et al (2022) stated that the main factors of delay in building construction were caused by human resources, financial resources and working methods. The main factor of project delay is also caused by changes in specification / design with a weighting value of 0.1264, and while research by Melyana & Sulistio (2022) which found errors in choosing a construction method with a weight value of 0.0912 need good planning and working methods, and research by Al Amri & Oztemir (2022) found that managerial issues involve delays in payments to contractors.…”

The Polyvocality in Action: Embodying the Epiphany on Public Housing Conundrum

“…To answer the question is the sole objective of this research. The public construction project in Indonesia mainly consists of two phases: the procurement phase and contract execution phase (Astadi, Sutarja, & Nadiasa, 2015). The latter is the phase the government difficult to control because there are plentiful peculiarities involved in the stage (Zidane & Andersen, 2018).…”

“…Meanwhile, the regulation on housing procurement 4 offers three different methods other than build mechanism. Those are swap, grant, and buy-directly-from-developer (Ashaf & Hidayat, 2019).…”

E-Procurement Implication on The Budgets Absorption in Indonesian Local Government (East Java Provincial Government Cases)

“…The procurement practices of goods/services and the increasing procurement performance of goods/services will be followed by the increased utilization of eprocurement technology, and is expected to accelerate and increase the realization of state and regional expenditures. But in fact in some research such as Arif (2012); Sukadi (2012); Juliani & Sholihin (2014); Astadi, Sutarja & Nadiasa (2015); Malahayati, Islahudin, & Basri (2015) revealed that the practice of procurement of goods/services is the main factor causing delays in budget absorption. Sirup.lkpp.go.id (2016) stated that East Java Province is the province that has the second largest procurement of goods/services in Indonesia in 2016 with total procurement of 11,905 packages and total ceiling of Rp4,793,120 million, which is done through E-procurement system.…”