Analisis Tingkat Kematangan (Maturity Levels) Unit Layanan Pengadaan Kabupaten Badung

Abstract

The implementation of government procurement of goods and service is governed by presidential regulation number 70 year of 2012. According to that, in Badung Regency implemented centralized in Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency. As the one of Indonesia procurement unit pilot, Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency has given the opportunity to perform a self assessment of its maturity levels as government unit. The objective of this research is to find factors that influence Procuremet Service Unit of Badung Regency maturity levels, and also to find out in what level is Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency stand. Data collection for this research have done by using questionnaire that involve 50 respondents who understand very well about the duties and function of Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency to perform a government procurement of good and services. The data analysis have been performed by use of factor analysis and supported by SPSS program. The result shows there are 3 factors that influent the Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency maturity levels, which are : the synergy and organization culture, resources and risk management and organization’s performance development. Whereas the maturity levels of Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency is stand at compliance. Based to the factors that formed, the highly commitment and strong leadership of Badung Regency leader are very decisive to push ahead the enhancement and the development of Procurement Service Unit of Badung Regency. First thing can be done is to establish an independent Procurement Service Unit therewith its Procurement Unit Development road maps that can be tiered and sustainable plan, monitor and evaluate

Contribution of Public e-Procurement to Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review

“…The factor identification intends to describe the qualitative research from Table 3. The further analysis of Table B2 shows the research method for the description of factors in Table 5 [22], [30], [32], [35], [21]. were using descriptive-analytic [22], qualitative approach [30], [32], [35], and descriptive [21].…”

“…The further analysis of Table B2 shows the research method for the description of factors in Table 5 [22], [30], [32], [35], [21]. were using descriptive-analytic [22], qualitative approach [30], [32], [35], and descriptive [21]. We did not find the use of quantitative methods such as the Statistical Factor Analysis method by the researcher in the factor identification.…”

“…Hulukati and Hikmawati [20] used the COBIT 5 framework. Darmapramita et al [21] used the Indonesia Procurement Maturity Model (IPM2) No.…”

Pengukuran Tingkat Kemampuan (Capability Level) Penerapan Teknologi Informasi Studi Kasus Pt. Bank Bri Syariah TBK.KC Lhokseumawe Menggunakan Framework Cobit 5 Domain Edm(evaluate, Direct, and Monitor)

“…Penerapan teknologi informasi disuatu organisasi dinilai sangat penting pula untuk menerapkan suatukerangka kerja yang digunakan sebagai acuan oleh pihak manajemenmulai dari perencaaan hingga evaluasi teknologi informasi, sehingga memungkinkan untuk mencapai tahapan tata kelola teknologi informasi didalam suatu organisasi bisa sebagai penopang dan pencapaian strategi serta tujuan organisasi (Wibowo, 2014). Cobit juga dapat digunakan dalam melihat keamanan di bank (Ula et all., 2017) dan dapat melihat teknologi pada perpustakaan (Pratama, 2017).…”