2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of classifiers in a predictive model of academic success or failure for institutional and trace data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the factors used to carry out the prediction tasks in OULAD, it can be observed slight differences in the most used factors with respect to the previous general work. Thus, a 39% of studies use the number of accesses to resources (clickstreams) [26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35], while a 25% of studies combine this information with demographic data from the students [27,28,32,[36][37][38][39]. Focusing solely on assignment information, only one study [40] uses exclusively this factor.…”
Section: Predicting Student Success In Distance Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the factors used to carry out the prediction tasks in OULAD, it can be observed slight differences in the most used factors with respect to the previous general work. Thus, a 39% of studies use the number of accesses to resources (clickstreams) [26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35], while a 25% of studies combine this information with demographic data from the students [27,28,32,[36][37][38][39]. Focusing solely on assignment information, only one study [40] uses exclusively this factor.…”
Section: Predicting Student Success In Distance Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the purpose of the different works, under the main task of predicting student performance, it can be found that the majority of studies pretend to predict whether the student will pass or fail a course [3,27,[30][31][32][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. Other approaches focus on the dropout rate [26,29,32,33], while others follow an early prediction study [33,35,36,46].…”
Section: Predicting Student Success In Distance Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marbouti et al [33] also employed LR to evaluate student performance in advance of the course with attributes of their attendances and assessment behavior. Silveira et al [2] compared LR, SVM, Naive Bayes and J48 in predicting academic success/failure based on the institutional data and trace data generated by a VLE, and the algorithm J48 presented the best classification accuracy and had the best execution time (excluding Naive Bayes). These machine learning methods show promising results in predicting students' performance with fix-length data.…”
Section: Student Performance Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, VLEs provide convenience for participants to enroll courses by breaking time and distance limitations. Moreover, online learning platforms based on the Internet are able to record a type of data, including data from a user's VLEs and other learning systems, which is called trace data [2] and profoundly help to provide personalized educational service after necessary analysis. However, online learning emerges in serious situations with a high dropout rate and heavy academic failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para isso, podemos usar dados de rastreio, que são dados gerados a partir da utilização de ambientes virtuais de aprendizagem ou de respostas a questionários e dados institucionais que socioeconômicos. Esse conjunto de dadosé altamente recomendado para execução de técnicas de mineração de dados educacionais, tanto para predição, quanto para realização de agrupamentos [Silveira et al 2019b].…”
Section: Uma Opção De Suporte Computacional Para Ap3cunclassified