2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of internal quantum efficiency in double-graded bandgap solar cells including sub-bandgap absorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that EQE ¼ 84% at 532 nm, the absorber thickness is 2.5 lm, and assuming l p /l n ( 1, we evaluate L n to 3 lm, which is above reported value from EQE measurements. 12 Our results show that the resistance modulation is sufficiently important to decrease the series resistance by more than one order of magnitude in the explored concentration range. Maximum efficiencies at concentration ratios $1000 would require improved R c , now limited by the contact of the probe on Au.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Given that EQE ¼ 84% at 532 nm, the absorber thickness is 2.5 lm, and assuming l p /l n ( 1, we evaluate L n to 3 lm, which is above reported value from EQE measurements. 12 Our results show that the resistance modulation is sufficiently important to decrease the series resistance by more than one order of magnitude in the explored concentration range. Maximum efficiencies at concentration ratios $1000 would require improved R c , now limited by the contact of the probe on Au.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…8,9 Especially the grading parameters within the space charge region (towards the front) seem to be critical. 7,8,11 Thereby, the extension in depth of the space charge region in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 absorbers lies in a depth range of a few hundred nanometers, 9,17 where under solar cell operation, most of the photoexcited carriers are generated. Table II shows the characteristic PV parameters of devices made from absorber layers that have been deposited in the same deposition runs as the samples for the depth profile analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, an increasing gallium content towards the molybdenum back contact is expected to enhance carrier collection and to decrease recombination via asymmetric diffusion, repelling electrons from the Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 /Mo interface. [5][6][7][8][9][10] The combination of a gallium grading towards the front and the back interfaces is commonly referred to as double grading. In general, a double grading within a Cu(In, Ga)Se 2 thin film can be achieved via the standard three-stage co-evaporation growth process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anyway, the maximum band gap at the back contact has to be optimized in order to obtain an improved short-circuit current density. Without back grading the internal quantum efficiency is lowered owing to the lack of quasi-electrical field which helps the photo-generated carriers to reach the contacts [12]. The optimization of band gap grading in CIGS shows an absolute gain in efficiency up to 3% [13].…”
Section: Conduction Band Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%