2019
DOI: 10.1108/jamr-11-2018-0100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of interpretive structural model of Indian railway security system by analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

Abstract: Purpose Security and safety have remained important concerns for mankind since ancient times. In the context of railways, however, the threat perceptions to safety and security have increased significantly lately. In view of this, the Indian Railways requires an effective and efficient security management system. The purpose of this paper is to propose an integrated approach to help develop the Indian railway security system (IRSS) by successively reducing the complexity of the system through a series of studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the subjective influence of the evaluator in the measurement process, it is difficult to reach an agreement. In such cases, consistency test can be carried out according to the principle of the specific formula of the matrix to ensure that the judgment results are relatively consistent on the whole [18]:…”
Section: Consistency Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the subjective influence of the evaluator in the measurement process, it is difficult to reach an agreement. In such cases, consistency test can be carried out according to the principle of the specific formula of the matrix to ensure that the judgment results are relatively consistent on the whole [18]:…”
Section: Consistency Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ISM methodology had been successfully used by several researchers for modeling similar research objectives that include analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics (Ravi and Shankar, 2005), modeling of knowledge management barriers (Singh and Kant, 2008), modeling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs (Rajesh et al , 2007), analysis of inhibitors of service supply chain (Pramod and Banwet, 2010), modeling of critical success factors of blockchain based cloud services (Prasad et al , 2018), modeling of Indian railway security system (Srivastava et al , 2019), etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The respondents ranked each parameters on the 9 point scale as suggested by Saaty (1980) given in Table 2. This is the most robust method designed to know the reflection of people related to various policies of government (Bahurmoz, Mukhtar, & Al-Sharqi, 2015;Pazil, Muhammad, Othman, & Abdullah, 2019;Srivastava, Gaur, Swami, & Banwet, 2019). It has been used in this study to compare and prioritize various benefits of GST implementation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP technique has been used in this study since it is one of the most widely used and preferred methods for multi‐criteria decision making in public related affairs (Bayazit, 2005; Kahraman, Demirel, & Demirel, 2007; Kumar & Gupta, 2020; Yoon, Kim, & Park, 2020; Lee & Chan, 2008). This is the most robust method designed to know the reflection of people related to various policies of government (Bahurmoz, Mukhtar, & Al‐Sharqi, 2015; Pazil, Muhammad, Othman, & Abdullah, 2019; Srivastava, Gaur, Swami, & Banwet, 2019). It has been used in this study to compare and prioritize various benefits of GST implementation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%