2007
DOI: 10.17487/rfc4980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Multihoming in Network Mobility Support

Abstract: This document is an analysis of multihoming in the context of network mobility (NEMO) in IPv6. As there are many situations in which mobile networks may be multihomed, a taxonomy is proposed to classify the possible configurations. The possible deployment scenarios of multihomed mobile networks are described together with the associated issues when network mobility is supported by RFC 3963 (NEMO Basic Support). Recommendations are offered on how to address these issues. Ng, et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our solution performs with a very low handoff delay of 47 ms in maximum ( Figure 6). Compared to previous solutions such as NEMO (where the handoff delay is about 1s [10]), our proposal reduces considerably the handoff latency. The performance measurements match our expectations and effectively show the advantages of implementing mobility management at lower layer.…”
Section: Handoff Latencymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our solution performs with a very low handoff delay of 47 ms in maximum ( Figure 6). Compared to previous solutions such as NEMO (where the handoff delay is about 1s [10]), our proposal reduces considerably the handoff latency. The performance measurements match our expectations and effectively show the advantages of implementing mobility management at lower layer.…”
Section: Handoff Latencymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition to being mobile, future architectures foresee that the airborne router establishes connections to multiple access network technologies at the same time. In this case, the network mobility extensions to Mobile IPv6 (Devarapalli et al, 2005) have to be complemented by specific strategies (Ng et al, 2007) to handle these multiple links. Fig.…”
Section: Overview Of the Future Aeronautical Communication Infrastrucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the extensions described in this document can also be used to support a mobile router with multiple care-of addresses. [RFC4980] contains an analysis of NEMO multihoming.…”
Section: Network Mobility Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%