Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics 2015
DOI: 10.5220/0005539005540557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Relay Effect on Wireless Power Transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the new developments in improving the transfer distance, a new planar design would be able to charge the devices on desks and tables. To address the poor transfer efficiency defects of a two-coil energy transfer mechanism, as considered in [20,23,59], midrange WPT techniques, such as relay resonators [60,61] (Figure 4a), four coils [15,[62][63][64] (Figure 4b), U coils [65] (Figure 4c), domino coils [56,66] (Figure 4d), array coils [67] (Figure 4e), and dipole coils [68] (Figure 4f) are proposed in previous studies and fused into future planar WPT chargers with increased distances or air gaps. Based on these studies, the transfer distances were 20, 60, 100, 180 (for seven resonator coils), 20, and 500 cm ( [60], [15], [65], [66], [67] and [68], respectively).…”
Section: Transfer Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the new developments in improving the transfer distance, a new planar design would be able to charge the devices on desks and tables. To address the poor transfer efficiency defects of a two-coil energy transfer mechanism, as considered in [20,23,59], midrange WPT techniques, such as relay resonators [60,61] (Figure 4a), four coils [15,[62][63][64] (Figure 4b), U coils [65] (Figure 4c), domino coils [56,66] (Figure 4d), array coils [67] (Figure 4e), and dipole coils [68] (Figure 4f) are proposed in previous studies and fused into future planar WPT chargers with increased distances or air gaps. Based on these studies, the transfer distances were 20, 60, 100, 180 (for seven resonator coils), 20, and 500 cm ( [60], [15], [65], [66], [67] and [68], respectively).…”
Section: Transfer Distancementioning
confidence: 99%