2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Risk Factors for Secondary New Vertebral Compression Fracture Following Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Patients with Osteoporosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many risk factors for non-surgical vertebral fractures in vertebroplasty. Some studies have found that cement intervertebral space leakage is an important influencing factor for new vertebral fractures [2,3] , which is consistent with the conclusions drawn by this study. Sun et al [4] found that if the bone cement is only confined within the trabecular bone range, there is no leakage, the risk of re-fracture of the adjacent vertebral body of the surgical vertebral body is 7%; the cement reaches the endplate level, then the adjacent vertebra The risk of fracture increased to 29%; when the cement reached the level of the intervertebral disc, the risk of an adjacent vertebra fracture increased to about 44%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There are many risk factors for non-surgical vertebral fractures in vertebroplasty. Some studies have found that cement intervertebral space leakage is an important influencing factor for new vertebral fractures [2,3] , which is consistent with the conclusions drawn by this study. Sun et al [4] found that if the bone cement is only confined within the trabecular bone range, there is no leakage, the risk of re-fracture of the adjacent vertebral body of the surgical vertebral body is 7%; the cement reaches the endplate level, then the adjacent vertebra The risk of fracture increased to 29%; when the cement reached the level of the intervertebral disc, the risk of an adjacent vertebra fracture increased to about 44%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In a recent retrospective study of 193 OVCF patients, Bae et al [16] found that 14.6% OVCF patients sustained SVCF after PVP procedures. Compared with the patients who did not experience SVCF, SVCF patients were identified as having poorer bone mineral content and worse bone cement distribution, which can be predictive factors of SVCF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that long-time menopause and preoperative multi-level vertebral fractures were likely to increase the risk that the patients would suffer from SVCF after PVP surgery, while high bone mineral density (BMD) likely decreased that risk [7]. Bae et al [16] indicated that SVCF that followed PVP surgery was associated with poor bone mineral content and poor distribution of bone cement. Besides, a higher incidence of SVCF may be caused by bone cement leakage into the disc, as compared to non-leakage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39,40] The study showed that the leakage of bone cement to the intervertebral space increased the risk of fracture of adjacent vertebral body. [35,41] The following mechanism of bone cement leakage may lead to a recurrent fracture of the adjacent [42] hold the point that there is no statistically significant difference in the efficacy and mechanical analysis of PVP by unilateral or bilateral pedicle puncture. VAN-MEIRHAEGHE et al [43]found that the strength and stiffness of injured vertebrae could be restored by unilateral injection or bilateral injection, which had no significant effect on the stress of non-operative vertebral body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%