2014
DOI: 10.1680/tran.11.00033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of the performance of under-sleeper pads in high-speed line transition zones

Abstract: In many high-speed railway lines, the zones between embankments and structures may present some discontinuities, in terms of track geometry and track stiffness, which may create discomfort for passengers, induce deterioration of track and vehicle materials and even raise the risk of derailment to dangerous levels. In the attempt to attenuate the consequences of such problems, some solutions pointing at progressively changing the vertical stiffness in the railway track have been tested, such as transition zones… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…USPs may be used primarily to reduce damage to the ballast by increasing the contact area and reducing contact stresses (Johansson et al, 2006;Witt, 2008;Lakusic et al, 2010;Abadi et al, 2015), or to smooth or reduce the variations in track stiffness typical of transition zones (Insa et al, 2013). USPs have also been shown to modify elastic deflection and permanent settlements (Auer et al, 2013), and are generally considered to improve the track quality (reducing rates of track geometry deterioration, ballast and sleeper wear, and rail corrugation; UIC, 2008UIC, , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USPs may be used primarily to reduce damage to the ballast by increasing the contact area and reducing contact stresses (Johansson et al, 2006;Witt, 2008;Lakusic et al, 2010;Abadi et al, 2015), or to smooth or reduce the variations in track stiffness typical of transition zones (Insa et al, 2013). USPs have also been shown to modify elastic deflection and permanent settlements (Auer et al, 2013), and are generally considered to improve the track quality (reducing rates of track geometry deterioration, ballast and sleeper wear, and rail corrugation; UIC, 2008UIC, , 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osim toga smanjuje se vijek trajanja objekata i tračničkoga vozila. Da bi spriječili neželjene posljedice na mostovima, za ublažavanje naglih promjena krutosti podloge koriste se betonski pragovi s podlošcima [6]. Ispitivanja su pokazala to da je ugradnjom podložaka na prijelaznoj dionici dovoljne duljine moguće postići mirniji prolazak vlaka preko podloga različitih krutosti, čime se smanjuje mogućnost oštećenja kolosiječne konstrukcije i samoga vozila (slika 7.).…”
Section: Primjena Betonskih Pragova S Elastičnim Podlošcima U Zoni Mounclassified
“…During operation, rail vehicles generate noise, vibration, and impact loads 78 due to roughness and imperfections at the wheel-rail interface. Impact loads are commonly 79 generated by: (i) differential stiffness at track transition zones such as bridge approaches, rail 80 crossings, and turnouts; and (ii) rail abnormalities such as wheel flats and dipped rails which 81 seriously hamper the safety and efficiency of tracks (Varandas et al 2011, Insa et al 2014. It is 82 also noted that track transitions such as bridge approaches, road crossings and slab tracks in 83 connection with ballasted tracks are common locations of accelerated track degradation due to 84 abrupt changes in support stiffness, and associated differential settlements.…”
Section: Introduction 70mentioning
confidence: 99%