2011
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.50.04de05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Within-Die Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor Process Variation with Reconfigurable Ring Oscillator Arrays Using HiSIM

Abstract: A pulsed glow discharge is used for sputtering in the presence of a gas flow to form a metal vapour jet suitable for use in a room-temperature metal vapour laser. It is found that the sputtering process is most efficient during the first 50 ps of the discharge pulse. Switching the discharge in the burst mode with a pulse duration of about 15 ps and an interpulse delay of about 18 ps achieves similar metal vapour concentrations in the jet to that attained by steady-pulse sputtering, but requires only half the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for horizontal variation in the rows verifies that the 3= (%) values are about 3-7 times larger for the case of the 65 nm technology, although the size of the ring-oscillator-array in the 180 nm technology design is almost 1.62 times larger than in the 65 nm technology design. 7) Similarly, for a fixed m-th stage with activated path2 for all P rows, we get Hmj ¼ HPmj À HTj . And hence, with these measurement data, we found that in the vertical direction, the 3= (%) values for the 65 nm technology are quite consistent with those in horizontal direction, as summarized in Table III.…”
Section: Single Stage Delaymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data for horizontal variation in the rows verifies that the 3= (%) values are about 3-7 times larger for the case of the 65 nm technology, although the size of the ring-oscillator-array in the 180 nm technology design is almost 1.62 times larger than in the 65 nm technology design. 7) Similarly, for a fixed m-th stage with activated path2 for all P rows, we get Hmj ¼ HPmj À HTj . And hence, with these measurement data, we found that in the vertical direction, the 3= (%) values for the 65 nm technology are quite consistent with those in horizontal direction, as summarized in Table III.…”
Section: Single Stage Delaymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, the vertical variation in 180 nm technology analysis is substantially larger than in horizontal direction, which we attribute to a systematic variation effect along the vertical direction during the respective wafer fabrication. 7) We have also studied the voltage dependence of the variation magnitude and of the position dependence in 65 nm technology. Table IV presents the trend of variation along horizontal direction for different row locations in die 1 at nominal core voltage (1.2 V) and at a reduced core-voltage level of (0.7 V).…”
Section: Single Stage Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations