2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical modeling and experimental validation of powder stream distribution during direct energy deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the powder flow can be divided into three different regimes: (a) Gaussian stream, (b) Transition stream, and (c) Annular stream. This study displays a good correlation with the experimental findings given in [37]. Figure 6 illustrates a comparison between the experimental (see Figure 4) and computational results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the powder flow can be divided into three different regimes: (a) Gaussian stream, (b) Transition stream, and (c) Annular stream. This study displays a good correlation with the experimental findings given in [37]. Figure 6 illustrates a comparison between the experimental (see Figure 4) and computational results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Hence, the powder flow can be divided into three different regimes: (a) Gaussian stream, (b) Transition stream, and (c) Annular stream. This study displays a good correlation with the experimental findings given in [37]. Figure 7 shows a comparison between the current analytical modelling with the numerical simulations of Emamian et al [34] and Duan et al [35], and experimental results of Peyre et al [36], with the emphasis on average peak temperature value, in case of LMD deposition process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In their work, the powder flow density was found to follow an annular distribution above and below the focal plan, which differs from the nozzle's size. Liu et al [13] placed the processing head statically above cylindrical containers with specific concentric holes of different diameters [14] and showed that the powder flow keeps pitot ian distribution within a +/− 2 mm distance to the focal plan. All these experimental studies allow a more or less accurate description of the powder jet structure and density, without clearly establishing a dependency on process parameters or on the nozzle design.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c p denotes the specific heat capacity of a particle, v p denotes the particle velocity, denotes the powder spatial mass concentration, T m denotes the melting temperature, and T 0 denotes the room temperature. For the heated powder flux with a 2D Gaussian distribution, previous literature suggests that an exponential distribution can describe the powder stream Gauss concentration under a coaxial nozzle [18]. The powder concentration x ′ , y ′ caused by powder feed rate F within a circular area with radius r is given by the following equation [18]:…”
Section: Temperature Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%