2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2016.04.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical study of mutual inductance of hexagonal and octagonal spiral planer coils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this simplicity brings some limitations regarding the coil geometries that the approximation applies for, as well as the precision of the model results. Based on the literature [1,8,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]30], there are several approximation formulas for calculating the inductance of planar coils, some are application specific [18,[30][31][32], or are only valid for one type of geometry such as the research works from Bryan, Terman, Olivei, Gleason, Dill and others [1,26,33,34], some remain valid for several regular geometries like the Data Fitted Monomial, the Current Sheet Approximation and the Modified Wheeler [1,24,26,35]. These last ones, due to their higher versatility and precision in the results, when compared to others proposed in the literature, are the ones most commonly used.…”
Section: Review Of Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this simplicity brings some limitations regarding the coil geometries that the approximation applies for, as well as the precision of the model results. Based on the literature [1,8,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]30], there are several approximation formulas for calculating the inductance of planar coils, some are application specific [18,[30][31][32], or are only valid for one type of geometry such as the research works from Bryan, Terman, Olivei, Gleason, Dill and others [1,26,33,34], some remain valid for several regular geometries like the Data Fitted Monomial, the Current Sheet Approximation and the Modified Wheeler [1,24,26,35]. These last ones, due to their higher versatility and precision in the results, when compared to others proposed in the literature, are the ones most commonly used.…”
Section: Review Of Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inductance calculations of hexagonal coils require solution of complex integrals obtained by using the Biot Savart law. However, this process can be simplified by using some approximations such as dividing the inner area of the coil into rectangular and triangular pieces [25,34]. The total flux in the inner area of the coil can be obtained by summing these flux values.…”
Section: Proposed Coil Design and Inductance Calculation For Hexagonamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them have accurate results [32,33]. However, the equations include many coefficients and complex integral forms [34].In this paper, a calculation method based on the Biot Savart law has been used to obtain the self and mutual inductances of hexagonal coils. It has been shown in the literature that higher efficiency systems can be realized by using cores and multiple coil designs [13,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model, the wire width of the coil is modelled as constant current-carrying filaments. Tavakkoli et al [29] derived a closed-form formula for the mutual inductance between coaxial hexagonal and octagonal planar spiral filamentary coils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%