2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11515-016-1393-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical and histological characteristic of the tongue and tongue mucosa linguae in the cattle-yak (Bos taurus × Bos grunniens)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

15
26
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
15
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These species differences depend on dissimilarities in types of food, feeding habits and handling of food materials in mouth (Iwasaki, ; Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ). In the present study, this was confirmed by the presence of five types of lingual papillae: three mechanical and two gustatory as noted in goat (Goodarzi and Shah Hoseini, ), cattle (Ding et al., ) and deer (Erdogan and Perez, ). While there are four types of lingual papillae, two mechanical (filiform and conical) and two gustatory (fungiform and circumvallate) as observed in barking deer (Adnyane et al., ), Bactrian Camel (Eerdunchaolu et al., ) and bats (Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ), while there are other animals have also four papillae: one mechanical (filiform) and three gustatory (fungiform, foliate and circumvallate) as recorded in rabbit (Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ), rat (Nasr et al., ), and dog and fox (Emura et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These species differences depend on dissimilarities in types of food, feeding habits and handling of food materials in mouth (Iwasaki, ; Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ). In the present study, this was confirmed by the presence of five types of lingual papillae: three mechanical and two gustatory as noted in goat (Goodarzi and Shah Hoseini, ), cattle (Ding et al., ) and deer (Erdogan and Perez, ). While there are four types of lingual papillae, two mechanical (filiform and conical) and two gustatory (fungiform and circumvallate) as observed in barking deer (Adnyane et al., ), Bactrian Camel (Eerdunchaolu et al., ) and bats (Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ), while there are other animals have also four papillae: one mechanical (filiform) and three gustatory (fungiform, foliate and circumvallate) as recorded in rabbit (Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ), rat (Nasr et al., ), and dog and fox (Emura et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The lingual prominence is a characteristic morphological character in some mammals especially that eat fibrous vegetation such as grass as noted in the present study and in Egyptian water buffalo (Emura and El Bakary, ), cattle (Ding et al., ), rabbits (Nonaka et al., ; Abumandour and El‐Bakary, ) and most artiodactyls (Chamorro et al., ; Zheng and Kobayashi, ; Gozdziewska‐Harłajczuk et al., ). Carnivores, omnivorous monkeys and pigs (omnivorous artiodactyls) not have a lingual prominence (Kumar and Bate, ; Emura et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Bison bonasus hybrid has a rectangular lingual prominence, as in paternal speciesthe European bison (Jackowiak et al, 2009). The same shape of lingual prominence has also been described in yak and in cattle-yak (Ding et al, 2016;Shao et al, 2010). In cattle, Egyptian buffalo, and Chinese yellow cattle lingual prominence is more triangular in shape (Emura & El Bakary, 2014;Fu, Qian, & Ren, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Some publications about distribution of mechanical papillae on the lingual prominence within Bovidae add the description of presence of lenticular papillae mostly on median part of torus (Ding et al, 2016;Ebru et al, 2010;El-Bakary & Abomandour, 2017;Emura & El Bakary, 2014;Jabbar, 2014;Kurtul & Atalgin, 2008;Mahabady et al, 2010;Shao et al, 2010). In our opinion, this traditional description and usage of the term lenticular papillae equate to the term reduced, very flattened conical papillae with micro tip of papillae, well visible by scanning electron microscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation