2003
DOI: 10.1002/ca.10159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anatomical sciences in the allopathic medical school curriculum in the United States between 1967–2001

Abstract: The present article surveys the changes in the time allocated for the four disciplines in the anatomical sciences in the medical curricula of allopathic medical schools in the United States from 1967-2001. The results indicate that there was a great reduction in the laboratory portions, but not in the lecture portions of Gross Anatomy, Histology, Neuroanatomy, and Embryology. The greatest time reduction overall for the disciplines occurred between 1967-1973 (502 to 387 hr), followed by the time reduction betwe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Traditionally, methods of learning neuroanatomy have included extended teaching time and supplementation through anatomic dissection and histological slides to examine the spatial 3-dimensional relations between structures. 3 Time constraints and desire for cost-effectiveness have prompted medical schools to reduce anatomy and laboratory teaching time with human cadaveric specimens, [3][4][5][6] the main supplementation material being textbooks and 2-dimensional images. 3,7 These restrictions may influence a person's ability to translate 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional spatial relations, as it requires the student to perform complex cognitive reconstructions, 8,9 potentially impairing neuroanatomical learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Traditionally, methods of learning neuroanatomy have included extended teaching time and supplementation through anatomic dissection and histological slides to examine the spatial 3-dimensional relations between structures. 3 Time constraints and desire for cost-effectiveness have prompted medical schools to reduce anatomy and laboratory teaching time with human cadaveric specimens, [3][4][5][6] the main supplementation material being textbooks and 2-dimensional images. 3,7 These restrictions may influence a person's ability to translate 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional spatial relations, as it requires the student to perform complex cognitive reconstructions, 8,9 potentially impairing neuroanatomical learning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One growing trend, however, is a reduction in time spent on human gross anatomy, one of the core foundations of medicine. The average time allocated to gross anatomy in United States allopathic medical schools has fallen from 249 hours to 144 hours from 1967 to 2001 (Gartner, 2003). The reduction raises concerns about whether the current state of anatomy education properly equips graduates for residency and beyond, (Waterston & Stewart, 2005) especially since the first year of medical school is often the only time specifically devoted to teaching anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the time devoted to anatomical dissection is declining and in parallel increasing lack of anatomical knowledge induces crisis in surgery that cause damage to underlying structures by surgeons specially during general and vascular surgery (Dobson, 2007;Gartner, 2003;Goodwin, 2000;Raftery, 2006). Finally, fixation materials such as formalin and phenol make the nerves and the veins to be similar staining feature like arteries that leads the difficulties to distinguish these three anatomical structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%