2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00665-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Andreev molecules in semiconductor nanowire double quantum dots

Abstract: Chains of quantum dots coupled to superconductors are promising for the realization of the Kitaev model of a topological superconductor. While individual superconducting quantum dots have been explored, control of longer chains requires understanding of interdot coupling. Here, double quantum dots are defined by gate voltages in indium antimonide nanowires. High transparency superconducting niobium titanium nitride contacts are made to each of the dots in order to induce superconductivity, as well as probe ele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
73
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplest case where Majorana manipulation is possible is in a double quantum dot (DQD). Tunneling Majorana modes in these basic structures have inspired theoretical studies [26][27][28][29] and experimental setups confirming the observations of Andreev molecules 30 . However, despite the fact that DQDs offer several possibilities for manipulation of MZMs, there is still no complete analysis of the possible transitions of these Majorana signatures between the QDs even in a simple model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The simplest case where Majorana manipulation is possible is in a double quantum dot (DQD). Tunneling Majorana modes in these basic structures have inspired theoretical studies [26][27][28][29] and experimental setups confirming the observations of Andreev molecules 30 . However, despite the fact that DQDs offer several possibilities for manipulation of MZMs, there is still no complete analysis of the possible transitions of these Majorana signatures between the QDs even in a simple model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Our four-terminal model allows us by essence to consider independent electron and Cooper-pair tunnelling. We note however that independent tunnelling can also be the result of modelling superconducting leads with two components, as done in [39]. We consider the system-bath (S-B) decomposition H S (t) ≡ H eff QD (t) and H B ≡ H lead , assuming the electron tunnelling amplitude κ to be the smallest frequency scale.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Master Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Another way to simulate the Kitaev chain is with chains of semiconductor-superconductor quantum dots. [26][27][28][29][30] For an infinite chain of quantum dots, the MZMs are sepa-rated in a continuous range of control parameters. However, for a chain of a finite number of dots, as in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%