1951
DOI: 10.2527/jas1951.103629x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Protein Factor and Antibiotic Supplementation of Small Grain Rations for Swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1952
1952
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In several experiments dietary antibiotics have increased killing-out percentages, but these have sometimes been associated with fatter carcasses (e.g. Huang & McCay, 1953;Pierce, 1954;Bowland, Beacom & McElroy, 1951;Wallace et al 1954).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several experiments dietary antibiotics have increased killing-out percentages, but these have sometimes been associated with fatter carcasses (e.g. Huang & McCay, 1953;Pierce, 1954;Bowland, Beacom & McElroy, 1951;Wallace et al 1954).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though it is generally accepted that this vitamin accounts for part of the activity of the 'animal protein factor', there is considerable confusion concerning its value as a 'feed additive' because of major differences in the basal ration to which it has been added in the evaluation of its possible effects. Thus appreciable positive stimulus to growth following vitamin B 12 supplementation has been recorded by Cunha et al (1950), Bowland, Beacon & McElroy (1951), Barber, Braude, Kon & Mitchell (1952), Dammers (1953) and Carpenter et al (1956) when dietary protein was of vegetable origin. Robinson et al (1952), however, failed to improve retarded growth rates by the addition of vitamin B 12 to an all vegetable ration, and, furthermore, Frens & Ubbel (1951) and Carpenter et al (1956) indicated that B 12 fortified vegetable rations were inferior to those including fish meal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Vohs, Maddock, Catron & Culbertson, 1951;Catron, Jensen & Maddock, 1951;Catron, Jensen, Homeyer, Maddock & Ashton 1952;Jensen, Ashton, Maddock, Homeyer & Catron, 1952;Barber, Braude, Kon & Mitchell, 1953). Bowland, Beacom & McElroy (1951), however, found animals treated with antibiotic to have lower carcass scores than the control animals, due to a reduction in length and increase in back fat. This was accompanied by increased dressing percentages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%