2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal species identification in food products: Evolution of biomolecular methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA characterized by more stability under intensive heating, pressures, and chemical processing, has conserved structure in whole body cells, has a great identification power since they are rely on the recognition of specific DNA segments sequence of a particular tissue or animal (Calvo et al, 2001;Frezza et al, 2003;Girish et al, 2004;Lanzilao et al, 2005;Akasaki et al, 2006;Arslan et al, 2006;Rashid et al, 2014). From DNAbased techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most employed, simple, time saving, sensitive and specific method that could identify the species of origin exposed to different processing conditions (Mafra et al, 2008;Bottero and Dalmasso, 2011;Floren et al, 2015). In addition, the use of PCR in food analysis has provided various analytical methods for rapid detection and identification at species and intra-species level; however DNA-based methods still face some important limitations especially for quantitative measurements of food composition (Woolfe and Primrose, 2004).…”
Section: Advances In Animal and Veterinary Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA characterized by more stability under intensive heating, pressures, and chemical processing, has conserved structure in whole body cells, has a great identification power since they are rely on the recognition of specific DNA segments sequence of a particular tissue or animal (Calvo et al, 2001;Frezza et al, 2003;Girish et al, 2004;Lanzilao et al, 2005;Akasaki et al, 2006;Arslan et al, 2006;Rashid et al, 2014). From DNAbased techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the most employed, simple, time saving, sensitive and specific method that could identify the species of origin exposed to different processing conditions (Mafra et al, 2008;Bottero and Dalmasso, 2011;Floren et al, 2015). In addition, the use of PCR in food analysis has provided various analytical methods for rapid detection and identification at species and intra-species level; however DNA-based methods still face some important limitations especially for quantitative measurements of food composition (Woolfe and Primrose, 2004).…”
Section: Advances In Animal and Veterinary Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellite markers had been widely investigated for many applications such as genetic identification, assessment of parentage, breed assignment tests and traceability (Dalvit et al, 2007;Fernández et al, 2013;Heaton et al, 2002;Orrù, Napolitano, Catillo, & Moioli, 2006;Rosa, Sardina, Mastrangelo, Tolone, & Portolano, 2013;Tolone, Mastrangelo, Rosa, & Portolano, 2012). DNA analysis furnished different levels of identification: individual one is useful for safeguarding public and animal health and providing safe products for both domestic and export consumption (considering also that national disease monitoring depends on correct animal identification), while breed and species discrimination are interesting to detect fraud and to protect and valorize typical products (Bottero & Dalmasso, 2011;Cunningham & Meghen, 2001;Dalvit, De Marchi, Targhetta, Gervaso, & Cassandro, 2008). Breed genetic traceability allowed the assignment or exclusion of the breed of origin to a product.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of multiple genetically engineered crops [64] is still an important topic in which the effect of food processing on plant DNA degradation and PCR-based analysis of transgenic foods has also been studied [65]. These DNA-based methods also allow the authenticity determination of meat and meat products [66], the identification of animal species in food products [67], as well as the authentication of maize [68].…”
Section: Food Analysis: Current State Of the Art Methodologies And mentioning
confidence: 99%