2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0952836901001133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual and seasonal variation of survival rates in the garden dormouse (Eliomys quercinus)

Abstract: Annual local survival of the garden dormouse Elyomis quercinus, a small, hibernating rodent, was studied by Cormack±Jolly±Seber models. The survival rates differed signi®cantly between the 4 years of the study; the average rate was 0.38 (95% con®dence interval: 0.25±0.52). Survival rates were not signi®cantly different between sexes. Because all garden dormice were captured after weaning, pre-weaning survival could not be estimated. After weaning, the annual survival rates did not differ between age cohorts. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, monthly overwinter survival in adult dormice was 96-98% in our study. In the larger garden dormouse, Eliomys quercinus (Schaub and Vaterlaus-Schlegel 2001), and edible dormouse, Glis glis (Lebl et al 2011), survival during hibernation was also estimated to be close to 100% (both studies used the program MARK for survival estimates). Our results, however, diVer from the low winter survival probabilities reported for common dormice in earlier studies (reviewed in Junkaitis 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, monthly overwinter survival in adult dormice was 96-98% in our study. In the larger garden dormouse, Eliomys quercinus (Schaub and Vaterlaus-Schlegel 2001), and edible dormouse, Glis glis (Lebl et al 2011), survival during hibernation was also estimated to be close to 100% (both studies used the program MARK for survival estimates). Our results, however, diVer from the low winter survival probabilities reported for common dormice in earlier studies (reviewed in Junkaitis 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since females actually emerge from hibernation with a lower body mass than males (Schmid 1999) as Schü lke & Ostner (2007) already pointed out, resource scarcity (food and/or water) is unlikely to be the ultimate cause why females choose to sleep through a large part of the dry season. Indeed, a constant and high level of overwinter survival relative to breeding season survival has been reported for many species where both sexes undergo obligate hibernation (Michener & Locklear 1990;Millesi et al 1999;Neuhaus & Pelletier 2001;Schaub & Vaterlaus-Schlegel 2001;Meaney et al 2003;Sendor & Simon 2003;Smith & Nichols 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there are conflicting results for over‐winter survival of hibernating small mammals (e.g. Arnold 1990; Fleming 1979; Schaub & Vaterlaus‐Schlegel 2001). Schaub & Vaterlaus‐Schlegel (2001), in their study on garden dormice ( Eliomys quercinus L.), argue that these animals are sufficiently well adapted to typical European winter conditions to survive the hibernal period with a high probability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnold 1990; Fleming 1979; Schaub & Vaterlaus‐Schlegel 2001). Schaub & Vaterlaus‐Schlegel (2001), in their study on garden dormice ( Eliomys quercinus L.), argue that these animals are sufficiently well adapted to typical European winter conditions to survive the hibernal period with a high probability. Mammalian species with reduced winter survival, in contrast, were usually studied in extreme habitats with a prolonged winter and/or unpredictable environmental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%