1999
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.859.10624323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.

Abstract: A previous study showed that measurements of total-body bone mineral changes made with a Hologic QDR 1000W were unreliable when the subjects underwent weight change. The study has been extended to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) apparatus from other manufacturers. Re-analysis of published results during weight loss using a Lunar DPX showed that they varied with the software used. Using the Extended mode, there was a 1% loss of bone mineral areal density (BMD), but no significant change in bone mineral c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this potential artifact would not explain our results. Fat mass has also been shown to overestimate BMC [78]. Again, this possible artifact should not affect the interpretation of our results because the paretic leg, with its higher fat mass, still had a lower proximal femur BMC than the nonparetic leg.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, this potential artifact would not explain our results. Fat mass has also been shown to overestimate BMC [78]. Again, this possible artifact should not affect the interpretation of our results because the paretic leg, with its higher fat mass, still had a lower proximal femur BMC than the nonparetic leg.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, discordant BMD and BMC results are biologically implausible, and are probably artifacts of DXA, which result from errors in determination of bone area. Tothill et al (1999) and Tothill (2005) evaluated the effect of changes in fat mass or distribution on measurement of BMC, BMD and bone area by placement of known quantities of lard on human volunteers or a phantom with BMC, BMD and bone area approximately equivalent to that of an adult male (Tothill et al, 1999). Addition of B6 kg of lard resulted in erroneous increases in BMC and bone area as measured using DXA scanners of various manufacturers, including the Lunar DPX used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in whole-body scan results have also been reported between manufacturers. (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) To overcome comparability problems, the International Committee for Standards in Bone Measurements (ICSBM) conducted a study in 1994 in which 100 women were scanned on all three DXA systems. The study was performed at UCSF using first-generation pencil-beam DXA systems produced by all three dominant manufacturers at that time: Hologic QDR 2000 pencil beam, GE Healthcare Lunar DPX_L and Norland XR26 Mark II.…”
Section: J Jbmrmentioning
confidence: 99%