Antalya ilinde örtüaltı yetiştiriciliği yapan üreticilerin iyi tarım uygulamalarına yaklaşımı

Sayın, Betül; Çelikyurt, Mehmet Ali; Kuzgun, Musa; Aydın, Başak

doi:10.16882/derim.2015.64269

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, GAPs and environmental awareness began to spread, and to avoid problems arising from agriculture. In this context, in Turkey (Hasdemir and Talug, 2012;Aydın et al, 2015;Sayın et al, 2015) and in different countries (Hobbs, 2003;Hongxu and Chengsuo, 2008) conducted GAPs and other related studies. Studies such as factors affecting the adoption of GAPs (Hasdemir and Talug, 2012), the analysis of the situation of adopters and non-adopters of GAPs have focused on such issues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparison of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (Akis) For Adopters and Non-Adopters of Good Agricultural Practices in Bafra District of Samsun, Turkey

Abdurahman

Demiryürek²,

Abacı³

2016

Turkish JAF Sci.Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Statistical analysis, such as Chi-square and t-test was used. The study results presented the socio-economic characteristics of farmers. There was a significant difference between adopters and non-adopters of GAPs, according to household size, organizational membership, farm size, livestock and crop production. Meanwhile, the information sources such as a district agricultural manager/personnel, adviser of the farmers' union association (GAPs) and pesticide/fertilizer dealers were preferred the main sources of agricultural information for adopters of GAPs. However, it recommended that information sources like research institute, university and cooperatives needs to be improved by strengthening their way of information dissemination. In terms of usefulness of AKIS for this study, it seems that this system was insufficient to analyze this study. Even though the functions of this system are essent ial elements, they are insufficient for establishing a network of complex innovation-oriented institutional arrangements. In the future, this study suggests to analyze GAPs it needs to use Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) approach, because this system have many interaction networks that can facilitate the researchers to reach the innovation easily to the intended farmers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Comparison of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (Akis) For Adopters and Non-Adopters of Good Agricultural Practices in Bafra District of Samsun, Turkey

Abdurahman

Demiryürek²,

Abacı³

2016

Turkish JAF Sci.Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Üreticilerin Biyolojik ve Biyoteknik Mücadele Uygulamalarına Bakışı ve Çevre Duyarlılıklarının Belirlenmesi

Sayın

Bayav

Beşen

et al. 2020

Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım Ve Doğa Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this research was to obtain descriptive information about two producer groups consisting of agricultural holdings applying and not applying biological and biotechnical (B/BT) control methods in in the research field, to determine the B/BT control practices applied in the field, to know the opinions of producers about B/BT applications, whether there are significant differences between the groups in terms of environmental sensitivity. In this study, a total of 216 producers were selected by using stratified sampling, 108 producers using B/BT control materials, and 108 producers in the same region with similar product pattern and agricultural holdings characteristics but not using B/BT control materials. A significant difference was found between the mean numbers of chemical

show abstract

Türkiye'de İyi Tarım Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi: Fındık Üreticilerinden Bir Bakış

TÜCCAR

Turhan

Cansev

2022

Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

228bilgilerinin olmaması ve her aşamada denetlendiği için sisteme dahil olmadıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Üreticilerin İTU ile birlikte üretim metotlarında, ilaçlama gübreleme gibi temel uygulamada daha bilinçli hareket ettikleri tespit edilmiştir. Zirai ilaç dolabı kullanımı, ecza dolabı kullanımı, ilaçlama maskesi kullanımı ve benzeri durumlarda İTU kapsamında olan üreticilerin İTU kapsamında olmayan üreticilere göre daha bilinçli olduğu gözlemlenmiştir. Aynı zamanda, İTU yapan üreticilerin daha fazla fındık verimi elde ettiklerini beyan etmeleri bu sistemin oldukça yararlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, fındık üretiminde İTU'nun sürdürülebilir tarım açısından pekçok olumlu avantajlarını ortaya koymuştur.

show abstract

Antalya ilinde örtüaltı yetiştiriciliği yapan üreticilerin iyi tarım uygulamalarına yaklaşımı

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

The Comparison of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (Akis) For Adopters and Non-Adopters of Good Agricultural Practices in Bafra District of Samsun, Turkey

The Comparison of Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (Akis) For Adopters and Non-Adopters of Good Agricultural Practices in Bafra District of Samsun, Turkey

Üreticilerin Biyolojik ve Biyoteknik Mücadele Uygulamalarına Bakışı ve Çevre Duyarlılıklarının Belirlenmesi

Türkiye'de İyi Tarım Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi: Fındık Üreticilerinden Bir Bakış

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About