1998
DOI: 10.4055/jkoa.1998.33.6.1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anterior Spinal Instrumentation in Treatment of Spinal Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al [ 16 ] reported that the correction of the kyphotic angle and loss of correction were statistically significant (p < 0.05) in both the anterior instrumentation and fusion groups and the single-stage transpedicular decompression and the posterior instrumentation groups. The correction loss in the anterior instrumentation group of our series was 6.8 ± 1.9°, comparable to the 9.4° loss in the series of Kim et al [ 15 ]. Similarly, the correction loss in the posterior instrumentation group in the present study was 6.1 ± 1.3°, comparable to the 3.4° loss in the series of Güven et al [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lee et al [ 16 ] reported that the correction of the kyphotic angle and loss of correction were statistically significant (p < 0.05) in both the anterior instrumentation and fusion groups and the single-stage transpedicular decompression and the posterior instrumentation groups. The correction loss in the anterior instrumentation group of our series was 6.8 ± 1.9°, comparable to the 9.4° loss in the series of Kim et al [ 15 ]. Similarly, the correction loss in the posterior instrumentation group in the present study was 6.1 ± 1.3°, comparable to the 3.4° loss in the series of Güven et al [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the report of Jin et al [ 5 ], a mean of 18° of kyphosis correction was achieved after anterior instrumentation surgery in the adult group during the follow-up period. In contrast, Kim et al [ 15 ], who operated on 21 patients with Pott disease by anterior instrumentation, mentioned that although a 67.7s% correction (11.3°) was achieved initially, a correction of 83s% (9.4°) was lost at the latest follow-up. Lee et al [ 16 ] reported that the correction of the kyphotic angle and loss of correction were statistically significant (p < 0.05) in both the anterior instrumentation and fusion groups and the single-stage transpedicular decompression and the posterior instrumentation groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Kim et al who operated on 21 patients by anterior instrumentation, mentioned that although a 67.7% correction (11.3 ) was achieved initially, a correction of 83% (9.4 ) was lost at the last follow-up. 18 Lee et al Reported the correction of the kyphotic angle and loss of correction was statistically significant (p < 0.05) in both the anterior instrumentation and fusion groups and the single-stage trans-pedicular decompression and the posterior instrumentation groups. 19 Recently, posterior-only procedures with or without anterior reconstruction are state of the art for management of spinal TB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[ 21 ] With the occurrence of graft subsidence, the vertebral screws may toggle, shift, migrate, or even pull out. Two studies [ 13 , 22 ] found that correction of the kyphosis angle and loss of correction were statistically significant in cases involving thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis, suggesting that anterior instrumentation is not efficacious for preventing correction loss in cases of spinal tuberculosis. Postsurgical deformities may also ensue from technical error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, 6.6% of cases showed strut graft failure, and full autograft integration was achieved in only 77% of the cases. Kim et al [ 13 ] reported that a correction of 67.7% (11.3°) was achieved initially by anterior instrumentation in 21 patients with Pott disease, but 83% of the correction (9.4°) had been lost at the last follow-up. In another study, [ 14 ] anterior decompression and fusion supplemented by the Kaneda device was performed for 20 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%