2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(02)00044-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anthropometric survey of Indian farm workers to approach ergonomics in agricultural machinery design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17]. Studies have reported nonavailability of the basic anthropometric data about working populations' handicap the efficiency of the product and process design and accurate analyses [18,19]. Many researchers studied that anthropometric body dimensions are different from one region to another region in India i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17]. Studies have reported nonavailability of the basic anthropometric data about working populations' handicap the efficiency of the product and process design and accurate analyses [18,19]. Many researchers studied that anthropometric body dimensions are different from one region to another region in India i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of ergonomic factors may play an important role in increasing efficiency of the humanmachine system. According to Victor et al (2002), anthropometric measurements are the most important considerations in designing ergonomically appropriate agricultural machineries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature specially relating to anthropometric data of male agricultural workers of India is available to a limited extent (Sen, 1964;Sen et al, 1977;Gupta et al, 1983;Gite and Yadav, 1989;Yadav et al, 1997;Victor et al, 2002;Dewangan et al, 2005). As far as the female workers are concerned available information suggests that steps have been initiated only in the recent past (Philip and Tewari, 2000;Tewari and Ailavadi, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%