2021
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10111350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibacterial Effects of Modified Implant Abutment Surfaces for the Prevention of Peri-Implantitis—A Systematic Review

Abstract: The aim of the present study was to systematically review studies investigating antibacterial implant abutment surfaces or coatings, which may suppress bacterial growth to prevent plaque-induced peri-implant inflammatory disease. Data were collected after identification of case, assay/laboratory procedure, predicate/reference standard and outcome (CAPO). Seven hundred and twenty (720) records were identified through data base searching. After screening nine publications fulfilled inclusion criteria and were in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since bacterial adhesion onto the implant surface is the initial step in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis, it seems crucial to find strategies to minimize bacterial adhesion and colonization by modifying the surface topography of the implants. Nanostructured surfaces have been demonstrated to exhibit antibacterial effects by either mechanically destroying attached bacteria or reducing their adhesion [6][7][8][9]. This effect is mainly caused by specific nanostructures of spikelike nanopillars, which have the capacity of mechanically destroying the murein wall of bacteria [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since bacterial adhesion onto the implant surface is the initial step in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis, it seems crucial to find strategies to minimize bacterial adhesion and colonization by modifying the surface topography of the implants. Nanostructured surfaces have been demonstrated to exhibit antibacterial effects by either mechanically destroying attached bacteria or reducing their adhesion [6][7][8][9]. This effect is mainly caused by specific nanostructures of spikelike nanopillars, which have the capacity of mechanically destroying the murein wall of bacteria [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could focus on biomaterials as such, or the direct alteration of the oral microbiome. The former might be achieved by the development of abutment materials with active antimicrobial effects that can inhibit bacterial growth, the latter by the domiciliary use of pro- or postbiotics and ozonized water to alter or to eradicate biofilms [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] So, the lack of an effective strategy to prevent longterm bacterial infection and meanwhile achieve strong cervical soft tissue integration has fueled the growing interest in surface modification or depositing functional coatings for the Ti/TiO 2 implant. 7 So far, numerous molecules such as chitosan, 8 peptides, 9 inorganic metal elements, 10 and antibiotics 11 have been applied to implant interfaces by physical adsorption or chemical covalent conjugation to fabricate an antibacterial or antimicrobial interface. Silver nanoparticles, alloys, and ions, in particular, have been widely used as promising candidates in the development of new bactericides due to their unique electronic, optical, and chemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4–6 So, the lack of an effective strategy to prevent long-term bacterial infection and meanwhile achieve strong cervical soft tissue integration has fueled the growing interest in surface modification or depositing functional coatings for the Ti/TiO 2 implant. 7…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%