1981
DOI: 10.7883/yoken1952.34.365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody Response to Structural Proteins of Measles Virus in Patients With Natural Measles and Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation has led to the hypothesis that SSPE is caused by a persistent infection of a measleslike defective virus in M protein which is responsible for the virus assembly. Similar results have been reported by others using the immunoprecipitation method (19,20,24,26,28). However, there are some conflicting reports from researchers using the same method (17,22) and also from those using other methods, i.e., solidphase radioimmunoassay (27) or immunoblotting (13).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This observation has led to the hypothesis that SSPE is caused by a persistent infection of a measleslike defective virus in M protein which is responsible for the virus assembly. Similar results have been reported by others using the immunoprecipitation method (19,20,24,26,28). However, there are some conflicting reports from researchers using the same method (17,22) and also from those using other methods, i.e., solidphase radioimmunoassay (27) or immunoblotting (13).…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…By immunoprecipitation we demonstrated that the antibody response to mumps virus was similar in the patient's serum and CSF and was directed against nearly all structural proteins including M-protein. In chronic measles-virus encephalitis a lack of antibodies against M-protein has been detected and the possibility of defective viral protein synthesis has been discussed, 26,27 The present case could represent a chronic form of mumps virus infection in the CNS. This can only be confirmed by virus isolation or demonstration of antigen within brain tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…No band corresponding to the M protein was visualized from the immunoprecipitate using M A b s against the M protein, in accordance with the previous study (Sato et al, 1985) (data not shown). Monkey hyperimmune serum against MV and a convalescent serum from an atypical measles patient, both of which strongly react with all structural proteins of MV including the M protein (Sato et al, 1981(Sato et al, , 1988, gave rise to a faint, barely recognizable M protein band (data not shown). By contrast, the M protein band was clearly resolved after immunoprecipitation with anti-M serum from a rabbit immunized with the M protein prepared after separation by S D S -P A G E (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%