2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antibody Treatment of Ebola and Sudan Virus Infection via a Uniquely Exposed Epitope within the Glycoprotein Receptor-Binding Site

Abstract: SUMMARY Previous efforts to identify cross-neutralizing antibodies to the receptor binding site (RBS) of ebolavirus glycoproteins have been unsuccessful, largely because the RBS is occluded on the viral surface. We report a monoclonal antibody (FVM04) that targets a uniquely exposed epitope within the RBS, cross-neutralizes Ebola (EBOV), Sudan (SUDV), and to a lesser extent Bundibugyo viruses, and shows protection against EBOV and SUDV in mice and guinea pigs. The antibody cocktail ZMapp™, is remarkably effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
5
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Serially diluted serum was mixed and incubated with 100 plaque-forming units of EBOV, and percent neutralization was determined relative to wells treated with media alone, as described in (55). Detailed methods are in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serially diluted serum was mixed and incubated with 100 plaque-forming units of EBOV, and percent neutralization was determined relative to wells treated with media alone, as described in (55). Detailed methods are in the Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar base-binder, 16F6, was also reported to neutralize SUDV only (Dias et al, 2011). Recently, we and others have identified several cross-neutralizing epitopes within the RBS (Howell et al, 2016; Keck et al, 2015) and the glycan cap (Bornholdt et al, 2016b; Flyak et al, 2016; Holtsberg et al, 2015), suggesting that development of broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) and cross protective vaccines may be feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear whether any of the therapies currently in development for EBOV infection, such as monoclonal antibodies and nucleos(t)ide analogues 711 , possess broad-spectrum activity against SUDV in the rigorous NHP models of SUDV infection. Recent reports have shown cross-protective efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in guinea pig and mouse models 1216 , with no data in the NHP model to date.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%