2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial activity of free and liposome-encapsulated thymol and carvacrol against Salmonella and Staphylococcus aureus adhered to stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
64
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The MIC of Thy varied from 0·01 to 0·02% and Carv from 0·02 to 0·04%, including MRSA strain, which differed with Engel et al . () who reported a MIC of Thy and Carv of 0·66 mg ml −1 and with Rodrigues et al . () who reported a MIC of Carv of 0·0025% (v/v) against S. aureus .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The MIC of Thy varied from 0·01 to 0·02% and Carv from 0·02 to 0·04%, including MRSA strain, which differed with Engel et al . () who reported a MIC of Thy and Carv of 0·66 mg ml −1 and with Rodrigues et al . () who reported a MIC of Carv of 0·0025% (v/v) against S. aureus .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The MIC of Thy varied from 0Á01 to 0Á02% and Carv from 0Á02 to 0Á04%, including MRSA strain, which differed with Engel et al (2017) who reported a MIC of Thy and Carv of 0Á66 mg ml À1 and with Rodrigues et al (2017) who reported a MIC of Carv of 0Á0025% (v/v) against S. aureus. The exposure to Carv at low concentrations induces an increase in the level of unbranched fatty acids and at higher concentrations severely damages the integrity and morphology of S. aureus cell membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This finding is not surprising since the antimicrobial activity of carvacrol has already been reported against several foodborne pathogens (Friedman, 2014;Nostro & Papalia, 2012), and resistant isolates (Memar, Raei, Alizadeh, Aghdam, & Kafil, 2017). In addition, similar MIC values (0.025-0.03%) have been reported for pure carvacrol against S. Typhimurium (Kamlesh et al, 2013) and S. enterica (Engel, Heckler, Tondo, Daroit, & da Silva Malheiros, 2017).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Activity Of Eossupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The antimicrobial properties of carvacrol directed against food-borne pathogens such as C. jejuni [26,29,30,37] Salmonella spp. [37,[43][44][45], Escherichia coli O157:H7 [46] and Bacillus cereus [47,48] have been shown in vitro recently. Synthetic carvacrol was, however, more effective against Gram-negative bacteria than against Gram-positive species [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%