2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43022-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Antimicrobial removal on piglets promotes health and higher bacterial diversity in the nasal microbiota

Abstract: The view on antimicrobials has dramatically changed due to the increased knowledge on the importance of microbiota composition in different body parts. Antimicrobials can no longer be considered only beneficial, but also potentially deleterious for favourable bacterial populations. Still, the use of metaphylactic antimicrobial treatment at early stages of life is a practice in use in porcine production. Many reports have shown that antibiotics can critically affect the gut microbiota, however the effect of per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the nose is more exposed to environmental changes, the increased number of species detected could be a result of transient bacteria that are not actual colonizers, and do not find much competition in a microbiota depleted by the antimicrobial treatment. However, this effect was not observed in previous studies [17][18][19] and may depend on several factors, including the age of the animals, the type of antimicrobial or the duration of treatment. Hence, this intriguing finding deservers further investigation to understand this phenomenon in the nasal microbiota.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Since the nose is more exposed to environmental changes, the increased number of species detected could be a result of transient bacteria that are not actual colonizers, and do not find much competition in a microbiota depleted by the antimicrobial treatment. However, this effect was not observed in previous studies [17][18][19] and may depend on several factors, including the age of the animals, the type of antimicrobial or the duration of treatment. Hence, this intriguing finding deservers further investigation to understand this phenomenon in the nasal microbiota.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Clinical observations indicate that overuse of antimicrobials at an early age can have a harmful effect later in the pigs' health [156]. In an attempt to understand this phenomenon, the outcome of perinatal antimicrobial treatment on the nasal microbiota at weaning was studied in two farms [157]. These two farms reported polyserositis cases in the nursery phase and used antimicrobials during the lactation phase for disease control.…”
Section: Figure A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, oral administration resulted in a more pronounced decrease in the bacterial diversity and a relative increase of the genera Actinobacillus and Streptococcus [30]. In another study, removal of perinatal antimicrobial treatment was associated with increased bacterial diversity and relative abundance of Prevotella and Lactobacillus in the nasal microbiota at weaning [31]. No studies have examined the initial colonization and development of the LRT microbiome in pigs.…”
Section: Initial Colonization and Development Of The Respiratory Tracmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were also identified, although at lower prevalence [ 21 , 29 , 35 , 36 ]. At the genus level, Moraxella was the dominant genus more often reported in the nasal cavity of healthy pigs throughout all the phases of production cycle, followed by Streptococcus , Clostridium and Lactobacillus [ 21 , 24 , 29 , 31 , 35 , 37 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Bacterial Topography Of the Healthy Respiratory Tractmentioning
confidence: 99%