2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of non-destructive substitutes for leaf area in different stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) focusing on traditional forest crown measures

Abstract: Research highlights▶ Determination of individual tree leaf area usually is only possible destructively. ▶ Surrogates which can be assessed non-destructively are investigated. ▶ From about 150 trees leaf area is estimated by 3P-branch sampling. ▶ These estimates are best correlated with crown surface area. ▶ Equations to determine individual tree leaf area non-destructively are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most of the previous studies, the correlation between the leaf area and the diameter at breast height was investigated (López-Serrano et al 2000;Turner et al 2000;Law et al 2001;Adl 2007;Arias et al 2007;Pokorný, Tomášková 2007;Calvo-Alvarado et al 2008;Babaei-Kafaki et al 2009), and less attention was devoted to the tree's crown-related parameters (Laubhann et al 2010;Vyas et al 2010). But, with the consideration of specific conditions of our investigated area, which is under traditional management, besides investigating other parameters, we also directed our attention to the crown-related parameters, particularly the crown volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the previous studies, the correlation between the leaf area and the diameter at breast height was investigated (López-Serrano et al 2000;Turner et al 2000;Law et al 2001;Adl 2007;Arias et al 2007;Pokorný, Tomášková 2007;Calvo-Alvarado et al 2008;Babaei-Kafaki et al 2009), and less attention was devoted to the tree's crown-related parameters (Laubhann et al 2010;Vyas et al 2010). But, with the consideration of specific conditions of our investigated area, which is under traditional management, besides investigating other parameters, we also directed our attention to the crown-related parameters, particularly the crown volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the results of leaf area predictions for sugar maple and yellow birch together (Tables and ), both CSA and crown width have similar predictive abilities, which were higher than those of dyeing wood disks that were sampled at 1 m and approached those associated with ERT. Accordingly, crown surface area was successfully used as a leaf area estimator for various tree species (Gspaltl & Sterba, ; Laubhann et al, ; Mäkelä & Albrektson, ; Raulier & Ung, ). As previously observed by Laubhann et al (), both the slope and the power parameter values (Equation ) that are associated with CSA were near unity, which indicates a proportionality relationship between tree leaf area and CSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, crown surface area was successfully used as a leaf area estimator for various tree species (Gspaltl & Sterba, ; Laubhann et al, ; Mäkelä & Albrektson, ; Raulier & Ung, ). As previously observed by Laubhann et al (), both the slope and the power parameter values (Equation ) that are associated with CSA were near unity, which indicates a proportionality relationship between tree leaf area and CSA. Consequently, if ERT measurements are unavailable, CSA and crown width are possible substitutes for estimating leaf area of sugar maple and yellow birch trees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, generally a limited number of trees are sampled, allometric equations are parameterized, and used for the other trees in the stand (e.g. Ledermann & Neumann 2006, Hietz et al 2010, Laubhann et al 2010, Gspaltl & Sterba 2011. Across the environmental gradients, LAI estimated by direct methods have been observed to be more accurate compared to the indirect methods (optical measurements) (Khan et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%