2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) to the evaluation of cancer patients with acute or chronic pain in palliative care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a consensus study involving 15 specialist nurses from the Gerontological Nursing Department of the Brazilian Nursing Association (ABEn). This sample size is similar to other previous studies that noted between 15 and 30 specialists and was adequate to generate relevant information to validate the content being examined (Azzolin et al., ; Juchem & Almeida, ; Lunney, McGuire, Endozo, & McIntosh‐Waddy, ; Mello, Massutti, Longaray, Trevisan, & Lucena, ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a consensus study involving 15 specialist nurses from the Gerontological Nursing Department of the Brazilian Nursing Association (ABEn). This sample size is similar to other previous studies that noted between 15 and 30 specialists and was adequate to generate relevant information to validate the content being examined (Azzolin et al., ; Juchem & Almeida, ; Lunney, McGuire, Endozo, & McIntosh‐Waddy, ; Mello, Massutti, Longaray, Trevisan, & Lucena, ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the validation of the outcomes and interventions according to the opinion of the specialists. The standard of acceptance was set at 90–100% consensus level of the recommendations by the specialists based on the previous studies (Azzolin et al., , Mello et al., , Juchem & Almeida, ). Afterward, the researchers performed a refinement of the analysis, excluding those outcomes and interventions that were not validated by the experts and had similarities in their definitions and/or repeated outcomes’ indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Question 26 showed no significant changes, since the institution is still on a process of research for the effective implementation of NOC in its working method. Studies have shown the applicability of NOC, aiming at the improvement and significant progress not only in the quality of documentation but also in the nursing practices 8 - 16 . Based on these results, it is clear that the operationalization of NOC in the institution tends to benefit the quality of nursing documentation, facilitated by the articulation of standardized languages and computerised systems 15 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent care interventions for this ND was to record pain as the 5th vital sign, which is essential for the evaluation of the presence or absence of pain caused by tissue injury and by activation of nociceptive transducers at the site of the surgical injury. This care requires attention from nurses, who should ask patients whether they are in pain and observe their facial expression, movements, and positioning, in order to better characterize, locate, and assess the intensity of pain (17) . The second most frequent ND was Risk for perioperative positioning injury, which requires preventive interventions, especially when the patient is in the operating room.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%