2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2015.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of membrane dewatering for algal biofuel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the separation of microalgae from water is an economically critical issue. Different treatment methods have been investigated including centrifugation, flotation, flocculation, sedimentation, and pressure-driven membrane processes [ 138 , 139 ]. Forward osmosis might be an alternative treatment technology here.…”
Section: Application Of Forward Osmosis Technology In Manufacturinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the separation of microalgae from water is an economically critical issue. Different treatment methods have been investigated including centrifugation, flotation, flocculation, sedimentation, and pressure-driven membrane processes [ 138 , 139 ]. Forward osmosis might be an alternative treatment technology here.…”
Section: Application Of Forward Osmosis Technology In Manufacturinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 57 ] Membranes may experience fouling (clogging of pores via use), which is dependent on pore size, favoring membranes with finer pores in most cases. [ 58 ] While smaller pore sizes limit flux (rate of filtration) with pure water, the reduced fouling may justify the use of UF membranes. [ 59–61 ] Fouling may depend on system flow, whereby alternating the direction of flow into the filter [ 62 ] or using cross‐flow systems with higher bulk flow velocity [ 63 ] improve filtration performance by reducing fouling.…”
Section: Harvesting Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration methods often show a 100% retention rate of cells (cells in retentate per cells in initial suspension), however, this may exclude any cell debris not captured by the membrane. [ 58 ] Recovery rate (cells available to downstream processes per cells in initial suspension) may be a more useful measure. [ 58 ] Although less frequently measured, it has been measured previously at 70–89%, [ 67 ] set at 80%, [ 68 ] or used synonymously with retention rate.…”
Section: Harvesting Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, low cost alternatives, natural settling, or flocculation assisted settling, must be used in at least the initial step with perhaps centrifugation for final dewatering of the now concentrated algal slurry. It might also be possible to develop a suitable membrane process for this final processing step [42][43]. A number of options are currently being explored for effective flocculation, including the use of electrical input or filamentous fungi [44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Algal Cultivation and Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%