2022
DOI: 10.3390/jnt3040014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Nanotechnology in COVID-19 Infection: Findings and Limitations

Abstract: There is an urgent need to address the global mortality of the COVID-19 pandemic, as it reached 6.3 million as of July 2022. As such, the experts recommended the mass diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection at an early stage using nanotechnology-based sensitive diagnostic approaches. The development of nanobiosensors for Point-of-Care (POC) sampling of COVID-19 could ensure mass detection without the need for sophisticated laboratories or expert personnel. The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques for POC d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[63] In the earlier review articles, for instance, discussions of synthetic methods, physical characteristics, electronic and material synthesis, sensor design, and personal health monitoring were covered, but the majority of novel fabrication methods were not mentioned. [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] The review article by Narita, Fumio, et al [76] explained how piezoelectric sensors using materials like BaTiO 3 , PbTiO 3 , and ZnO were used for COVID-19 and other virus detection. Nikhil Bhalla and colleagues study biochemical sensors and analytical tools to critically examine the barriers preventing the use of advanced sensing technologies in pandemic diseases.…”
Section: Nanomaterials For Electronic Virus Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[63] In the earlier review articles, for instance, discussions of synthetic methods, physical characteristics, electronic and material synthesis, sensor design, and personal health monitoring were covered, but the majority of novel fabrication methods were not mentioned. [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75] The review article by Narita, Fumio, et al [76] explained how piezoelectric sensors using materials like BaTiO 3 , PbTiO 3 , and ZnO were used for COVID-19 and other virus detection. Nikhil Bhalla and colleagues study biochemical sensors and analytical tools to critically examine the barriers preventing the use of advanced sensing technologies in pandemic diseases.…”
Section: Nanomaterials For Electronic Virus Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the earlier review articles, for instance, discussions of synthetic methods, physical characteristics, electronic and material synthesis, sensor design, and personal health monitoring were covered, but the majority of novel fabrication methods were not mentioned. [ 64–75 ] The review article by Narita, Fumio, et al. [ 76 ] explained how piezoelectric sensors using materials like BaTiO 3 , PbTiO 3 , and ZnO were used for COVID‐19 and other virus detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swab the nose or the throat, or spit. [22] Time required to observe the results:-The average wait time is between 2 and 3 days.…”
Section: Rt-pcr Rapid Antigen Testing Kits Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%