2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-015-0366-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of scattering theory to P-wave amplitude fluctuations in the crust

Abstract: The amplitudes of high-frequency seismic waves generated by local and/or regional earthquakes vary from site to site, even at similar hypocentral distances. It had been suggested that, in addition to local site effects (e.g., variable attenuation and amplification in surficial layers), complex wave propagation in inhomogeneous crustal media is responsible for this observation. To quantitatively investigate this effect, we performed observational, theoretical, and numerical studies on the characteristics of sei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each source model, PGV ratio is relatively close to 1 for the heterogeneous model with a = 1 km. Small value of a results in small fluctuations in PGV because it is related to the level of the power spectrum of random heterogeneity at small wave numbers, as Yoshimoto et al (2015) discussed in their interpretation of the hypocentral distance dependence of amplitude level variance. Comparison of PGV ratio for S1_3.3 and S1_0.5 Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Ground Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each source model, PGV ratio is relatively close to 1 for the heterogeneous model with a = 1 km. Small value of a results in small fluctuations in PGV because it is related to the level of the power spectrum of random heterogeneity at small wave numbers, as Yoshimoto et al (2015) discussed in their interpretation of the hypocentral distance dependence of amplitude level variance. Comparison of PGV ratio for S1_3.3 and S1_0.5 Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Ground Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For S1_3.3 with a = 3 and 5 km, SD for Sv (2 s) reaches 0.3 at a distance of 120-150 km, whereas it is less than 0.2 at distances of less than 90 km. This may be explained by an analogy to amplitude fluctuation of short-period waves in heterogeneous media that saturate at a certain traveling distance (e.g., Hoshiba 2000;Yoshimoto et al 2015).…”
Section: Spatial Variability Of Ground Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c, d (λ P and λ S , respectively) were calculated by using the central frequencies of each band and seismic velocities in the crust. Observed amplitudes are scattered around master attenuation curves, reflecting the effects of non-isotropic source radiation and fluctuation of amplitude due to small-scale velocity inhomogeneity along propagation path (e.g., Hoshiba 2000; Yoshimoto et al 2015).…”
Section: Apparent Radiation Pattern For Crustal Earthquakesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of coda waves can thus lead to detailed views of seismic structure and provide valuable information on the dynamics and evolution of the Earth (e.g., Kubanza et al 2006). To explore the stochastic properties of these small-scale heterogeneities in the crust and upper mantle, for several decades, direct and coda waves propagating in the random media have been intensively studied based on both theoretical and numerical methods (e.g., Aki 1973;Scherbaum and Sato 1991;Gusev and Abubakirov 1999;Kubanza et al 2007;Takahashi et al 2009;Carcolé and Sato 2010;Yoshimoto et al 2015;Eulenfeld and Wegler 2017;Emoto and Sato 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, spatial variations of lithospheric heterogeneity have been globally established to correlate with tectonic settings based on Markov approximation (e.g., Kubanza et al 2006Kubanza et al , 2007. Besides the theoretical methods, numerical simulations of scattered waves propagating in random medium using finite difference methods have been conducted to determine the statistical parameters of random heterogeneities (e.g., Frankel and Clayton 1986;Yoshimoto et al 2015;Emoto et al 2017;Takemura et al 2017) and effects on ground motions (e.g., Hartzell et al 2010;Imperatori and Mai 2013;Savran and Olsen 2019). These studies have demonstrated various random models within the Earth's lithosphere and revealed significantly variable regional randomnesses from the shallow crust to uppermost mantle (Kubanza et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%