Application of solvent-bar micro-extraction for the determination of organic and inorganic compounds

López-López, José A.; Mendiguchı́a, Carolina; Pinto, Juan J.; Moreno, Carlos

doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.034

Cited by 37 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, the fiber is removed from the sample, and the acceptor solution is taken out by cutting it or pricking it with the syringe needle. The technique was named solvent bar microextraction (SBME); its main advantage over classical HFME is that there is no need to support the fiber during extraction and, thus, more samples can be processed concurrently [15].…”

Section: Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For more information on the different membrane-based microextractions and the recent developments in this field, the interested reader is referred to some excellent reviews published recently [12,15,26,27].…”

Section: Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The solvent in the membrane pores or the "supported liquid" (in two-phase HFME, the same solvent is also in the lumen) should be immiscible with water and compatible with the fiber material; additional preferred features are low volatility and viscosity. For this, 1-octanol is used most commonly, but toluene, di-n-hexyl ether, n-hexane, 1-nonanol, n-nonane, 1-undecanol, n-tetradecane, cyclohexane, and ethyl acetate are used as well [15]. Different ionic liquids are also applied instead of organic solvents [15,32].…”

Section: Factors Influencing Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For this, 1-octanol is used most commonly, but toluene, di-n-hexyl ether, n-hexane, 1-nonanol, n-nonane, 1-undecanol, n-tetradecane, cyclohexane, and ethyl acetate are used as well [15]. Different ionic liquids are also applied instead of organic solvents [15,32].…”

Section: Factors Influencing Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For further detailed information on method optimization, readers should refer to previously published reviews [4,12,13,15,26,31,32].…”

Section: Factors Influencing Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Applications of Hollow-Fiber and Related Microextraction Techniques for the Determination of Pesticides in Environmental and Food Samples—A Mini Review

Prosen

2019

Separations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pesticides represent one of the most important groups of analytes in environmental analysis. Moreover, their levels are very frequently determined in food and beverages due to the concern over their possible adverse health effects. Their concentration in samples is usually very low; thus, they have to be preconcentrated. Conventional solvent and solid-phase extractions are mainly used for this purpose, but miniaturized approaches are also being applied more and more often. The present review covers solvent microextractions that use a semi-permeable membrane barrier between the sample and the solvent. The main representatives of this approach are hollow-fiber microextraction (HFME), solvent bar microextraction (SBME), electromembrane extraction (EME), and different variations of those, such as combinations with other sorbent or solvent microextractions, electromigration, etc. The relevant research from the last decade, dealing with the application of these microextractions to the isolation of pesticides from various environmental and food samples, is critically discussed with emphasis on their strengths and weak points.

show abstract

Section: Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Factors Influencing Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Factors Influencing Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For further detailed information on method optimization, readers should refer to previously published reviews [4,12,13,15,26,31,32].…”

Section: Factors Influencing Membrane-based Solvent Microextraction Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Applications of Hollow-Fiber and Related Microextraction Techniques for the Determination of Pesticides in Environmental and Food Samples—A Mini Review

Prosen

2019

Separations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Recent applications of microextraction sample preparation techniques in biological samples analysis

Daryanavard

Zolfaghari

Abdel-Rehim

et al. 2021

Biomedical Chromatography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of biological samples is affected by interfering substances with chemical properties similar to those of the target analytes, such as drugs. Biological samples such as whole blood, plasma, serum, urine and saliva must be properly processed for separation, purification, enrichment and chemical modification to meet the requirements of the analytical instruments. This causes the sample preparation stage to be of undeniable importance in the analysis of such samples through methods such as microextraction techniques. The scope of this review will cover a comprehensive summary of available literature data on microextraction techniques playing a key role for analytical purposes, methods of their implementation in common biological samples, and finally, the most recent examples of application of microextraction techniques in preconcentration of analytes from urine, blood and saliva samples. The objectives and merits of each microextration technique are carefully described in detail with respect to the nature of the biological samples. This review presents the most recent and innovative work published on microextraction application in common biological samples, mostly focused on original studies reported from 2017 to date. The main sections of this review comprise an introduction to the microextraction techniques supported by recent application studies involving quantitative and qualitative results and summaries of the most significant, recently published applications of microextracion methods in biological samples. This article considers recent applications of several microextraction techniques in the field of sample preparation for biological samples including urine, blood and saliva, with consideration for extraction techniques, sample preparation and instrumental detection systems.

show abstract

Simultaneous determination of furosemide and carbamazepine in biological matrices by solvent bar microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography–diode array detector and central composite design

Al-Hashimi

Al‐Degs

Jaafreh

et al. 2022

Biomedical Chromatography

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A sensitive and simple sample pretreatment method based on a two-phase solvent bar microextraction (SBME) technique coupled with HPLC-diode array detector (DAD) was developed for simultaneous extraction and determination of trace amounts of furosemide and carbamazepine in human urine and plasma samples. The significance of operational factors on carbamazepine and furosemide extraction efficiency % (EE%) was screened using full factorial design (FFD) while central composite design (CCD) was used to model the entire process. A quadratic model was found convenient to correlate the extraction EE% of selected drugs with dominant experimental factors. A Pareto chart was also used to examine the importance of factors on drugs' EE%. The analytical performance of the method in urine and plasma samples demonstrated good linearity (R 2 > 0.992) with detection limits ranging from 4.2 to 10.9 μg L À1 , and extraction recovery over 89.45% for both drugs in urine and plasma samples. A comparison against published methods was also performed and the results revealed that the developed method exhibits a confident sensitivity, feasible operation, and simple analysis for both drugs. Finally, the practicability of the validated SBME-HPLC-DAD method was demonstrated by successfully applying it to the analysis of furosemide and carbamazepine in real patient urine samples.biological matrices, central composite design, design of experiment, furosemide and carbamazepine, HPLC-DAD, solvent bar microextraction | INTRODUCTIONFurosemide (FUR), 4-chloro-N-furfuryl-5-sulfamoyl-anthranilic acid, is a potent loop diuretic and frequently used in the treatment of edematous states related to chronic failure, hypertension, or cirrhosis of the liver (Krisanapan et al., 2020). FUR is rapidly but incompletely absorbed after oral administration and highly bound to plasma proteins (>90%; Wenk et al., 2006), with up to 50% of a dose eliminated by urinary excretion, mainly as an unchanged drug (Oh & Han, 2015). Carbamazepine (CBZ), 5-H-dibenze[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide, is a tricyclic lipophilic compound used as an anticonvulsant and mood-stabilizing drug in the treatment and prevention of seizures caused by epilepsy (Lawthom et al., 2018). After oral administration,

show abstract

Application of solvent-bar micro-extraction for the determination of organic and inorganic compounds

Cited by 37 publications

References 46 publications

Applications of Hollow-Fiber and Related Microextraction Techniques for the Determination of Pesticides in Environmental and Food Samples—A Mini Review

Applications of Hollow-Fiber and Related Microextraction Techniques for the Determination of Pesticides in Environmental and Food Samples—A Mini Review

Recent applications of microextraction sample preparation techniques in biological samples analysis

Simultaneous determination of furosemide and carbamazepine in biological matrices by solvent bar microextraction combined with high‐performance liquid chromatography–diode array detector and central composite design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About