Application of the 3D slicer chest imaging platform segmentation algorithm for large lung nodule delineation

Abstract

PurposeAccurate segmentation of lung nodules is crucial in the development of imaging biomarkers for predicting malignancy of the nodules. Manual segmentation is time consuming and affected by inter-observer variability. We evaluated the robustness and accuracy of a publically available semiautomatic segmentation algorithm that is implemented in the 3D Slicer Chest Imaging Platform (CIP) and compared it with the performance of manual segmentation.MethodsCT images of 354 manually segmented nodules were downloaded from the LIDC database. Four radiologists performed the manual segmentation and assessed various nodule characteristics. The semiautomatic CIP segmentation was initialized using the centroid of the manual segmentations, thereby generating four contours for each nodule. The robustness of both segmentation methods was assessed using the region of uncertainty (δ) and Dice similarity index (DSI). The robustness of the segmentation methods was compared using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test (pWilcoxon<0.05). The Dice similarity index (DSIAgree) between the manual and CIP segmentations was computed to estimate the accuracy of the semiautomatic contours.ResultsThe median computational time of the CIP segmentation was 10 s. The median CIP and manually segmented volumes were 477 ml and 309 ml, respectively. CIP segmentations were significantly more robust than manual segmentations (median δCIP = 14ml, median dsiCIP = 99% vs. median δmanual = 222ml, median dsimanual = 82%) with pWilcoxon~10−16. The agreement between CIP and manual segmentations had a median DSIAgree of 60%. While 13% (47/354) of the nodules did not require any manual adjustment, minor to substantial manual adjustments were needed for 87% (305/354) of the nodules. CIP segmentations were observed to perform poorly (median DSIAgree≈50%) for non-/sub-solid nodules with subtle appearances and poorly defined boundaries.ConclusionSemi-automatic CIP segmentation can potentially reduce the physician workload for 13% of nodules owing to its computational efficiency and superior stability compared to manual segmentation. Although manual adjustment is needed for many cases, CIP segmentation provides a preliminary contour for physicians as a starting point.

PET/CT Radiomics in Lung Cancer: An Overview

“…The process is also complicated by the presence of areas such as necrosis, atelectasis, and/or inflammation, whose role in the radiomics work-flow is not fully understood yet. Although a number of automated (e.g., adaptive thresholding [25], convolutional networks) and semi-automated (e.g., level-set [26], region growing [27]) methods have been proposed, manual delineation is still regarded by many as the ground truth [6].…”

Quantitative Chest CT analysis in COVID-19 to predict the need for oxygenation support and intubation

“…In-hospital deaths and healed patients' discharge dates were also noted. [17]. This software, validated as useful in the surgical setting [18], performed a rst-pass automated segmentation; then, lung volumes were manually perfected using three-dimensional tools such as spherical brushes or erasers.…”

Lung tumor segmentation methods: Impact on the uncertainty of radiomics features for non-small cell lung cancer

“…Semi-automatic contours were generated by three trained observers using the GrowCut algorithm from 3D-Slicer [ 11 ] and the Lesion Sizing Toolkit (LSTK) [ 19 ]. While the segmentation accuracy of LSTK has been evaluated [ 19 , 20 ], to our knowledge the reliability of radiomics features extracted from LSTK-generated contours has not been studied. Additionally, we evaluated whether manual software tools and semi-automatic software tools can be used interchangeably for generating contours for feature extraction.…”